Subodh Kumar Trivedi Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Decided On : Nov-24-2000

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 226, Article 226, a Constitution Bench, Section 34, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Section 9 of the U. P. Sales Tax Act, Section 9, Section 33A of the Act, Section 35, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 68, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 68, Article 226 of the Constitution.(ii, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution on the, the Division Bench, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226/227 of the Constitution, Section 68, Section 68, Section 68, Section 68, Article 311 of the Constitution of India

DATE: August 1, 1997, October 13., 1997, April 17, 1999, two weeks, three years, April 17, 1999, the year 1997, 1950]1SCR566, '17, '18, '19, 1966]1SCR284, 1971)3SCC792, 1948, 1991, 1998, 1985, 1986, 1989, several years, several years, 1998, 1999, 1997, 1213, 11 years, 2000, 1974, April 17, 1999, September 5. 1991, May 25, 1996, September 21, 1996, the years 1992-93 and, 1993-94, June 11, 1996, October 15, 1996, November 1, 1996, June 11, 1996, May 25, 1996, 1991-92 and, 1992-93.(iv, the year 1992-93, November 22, 1996, November 4. 1996, 1992-93, June 11, 1996, May 25, 1996, 1992-93, February 26, 1996, the financial year 1992-93, 1993-94, March 3, 1997, three days, March 6, 1997, April 15, 1997, March 4, 1997, March 4, 1996, September 12, 1996, the year 1992-93, 1993-94, 1994, 1992, 1987, 2000, 1591, March 3, 1997, March 6, 1997, August 1, 1997, a period of, three months

ORG: Court, the High Court, Court, the Enquiry Officer, State, State, Justice, State, the U. P. Public Services, Tribunal, Justice, the High Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, State, Court, State, the High Court, the High Court, State, State, State, Court, Court, Court, the Public Services Tribunal, Justice, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the Public Services Tribunal, Court, the High Court, the Public Services Tribunal, the Apex Court, the High Court, the High Court, Justice, Court, Judicial, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, petition.14, Whirlpool Corporation, Registrar of Trade Marks, the Apex Court, HighCourt, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Jurisdiction, The Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, State of U. P. v. Mohd, Noon AIR 1958, Court, Collector of Customs v. Ramchand Sobhrqj Wadhwani, Court, Solicitor General, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd., ITO, certiorari, the High Courts, the High Courts, The Supreme Court, Whirlpool Corporation, the High Court, Reliance, Collector of Monghyr, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, ChandraMoheshwari, Antarim Ztta, The Supreme Court, State, The High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, Reliance, Asstt, Judicial 1, Sales Tax Kanpur Range, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Centurary Spinning, Ulhasnagar Municipal Council, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Gorakhpur University, the Apex Court, Hirdai, IncomeTax, the High Court, The Apex Court, the High Court, Ashok Kumar, Leather Development and Marketing Corporation, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Labour Court, Reliance, Ashok Kumar, Leather Development and Marketing Corporation, the High Court, Court, Education, Court, Court, Court, Sudhakar Malviya, Benaras Hindu University, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, The High Court, the High Court, or(d, State, Court, Court, Public Services Tribunal, State, the Division Bench, Tribunal, Court, the Division Bench, the Public Service Tribunal, the Division Bench, Public Services Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the Division Bench, State, State of U. P., Government, the State Public Services Tribunal, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the State of U. P., the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Division Bench, Court, Lordship, the Public Services Tribunal, the Division Bench, Court, the Public Services Tribunal, the High Court, Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Public Services Tribunal, Government, Public Services Tribunal, the High Court, the Public Services Tribunal, Court, Court, the Public Services Tribunal, Court, the Public Services Tribunal, the High Court, the State Public Services Tribunal, the High Court, the U.P. Public Services, the Public Services Tribunal, the Public Services Tribunal, State, University of Lucknow, the Selection Committee, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Selection Committee, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Selection Committee, the Executive Council of the University, the Executive Council, the Selection Committee, the Supreme Court, the Executive Council, the High Court, the Executive Council, the Supreme Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, Sudhakar Malviya, case.47, the High Court, the Apex Court, High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, State Public Services, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, State, Samaj Kalyan Department, Ministerial Cadre Service Rules, Manila Evam Bal Vikas Vibhag, the State Government, District Social Welfare Officer, the District Social Welfare, Faizabad Mandal, Social Welfare, Social Welfare, Photostat, the Enquiry Officer, Government, SI, the Enquiry Officer, the Enquiry Officer, the Sanjaya Gandhi Janta Sahayogi Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Baba Ratandas Smarak, Sanjaya Gandhi, the District Social Welfare Officer, State of U. P. v., the Supreme Court, Reliance, LCD 594, the High Court, Government, Registrar Cooperative Society, the High Court, Justice, the High Court, CCA Rules, the High Court, Un, State, the State Sri Alok Sinha, Court, the Enquiry Officer, State, Justice

PERSON: Sri Ritu Raj Awasthi, Rashid Ahmed v. Municipal Board, Kairana, K. S. Rashid, A. V. Venkateswaran, Abrol v. M/s. Shantilal, Bengal, North Adlai Coal Co. Ltd, Kuntesh Gupta v. Management, Prakash, Haryana, Kanpur, Devi Lal Sahu v. Union, Nathi Mal Ram Sahal Mal, V. C., Shyam, Jat Ktshan, V. P. Cooperative Bank Ltd., Hirday Narain v. I.T.O., Kumar Saxena, Labh Chand, Bench, Bench, Benches, G. Sarna, G. Sarna, G. Sarna, Kuntesh Gupta, Samaj Kalyan.53, Samaj Kalyan, Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Jariyari, Sri R. C. Mathur, Sri R. C. Mathur, Sanjaya Gandhi, Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Jariyari, Sri R. C. Mathur.56, Samaj Kalyan, Samaj Kalyan, Sri R. C. Mathur, Jariyari, Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Jariyari, Chhotey Lal, Chhotey Lal, Chhotey Lal, Shatrughan Lal, Uma Shanker Yadav, Avtar Singh v. State of U. P.

NORP: Justification

CARDINAL: one, one, 1954]25ITR167(SC, 1983ECR2151D(SC, 1, two, 2, 1961]41ITR191(SC, 1963]1SCR98, two, 1969]1SCR518, 1987(32)ELT8(SC, 1968]1SCR505, 480, 1970]3SCR854, 161, 99, 1970]78ITR26(SC, 16, 2, 144, 1970]78ITR26(SC, 16, 17, 2, 328, 29.8.2000, 1993)IILLJ724SC, One, all.46, only one, three, three, 6.2.1993, 8.4.1992, three, 4, one, two, two, one, three, 1998]3SCR939, 12, 2, 849, 7, 2

EVENT: SC 86

GPE: Baburam, Jurisdiction, Lucknow, Labh Chand, action.41, principles.50, Barabanki, Barabanki, Barabanki, Sri R. C., Lucknow, Barabanki, Mahmoodabad, Barabanki

ORDINAL: first, Second, second, second, second, second, second

FAC: Hirday Narain, Sanjaya Gandhi, Yash Pal Verma v. M/s. Hindustan Machines Tools Limited, Om Pal Singh v. District Development

PRODUCT: LCD 6, LCD 6, LCD 904, Judgment, Probation

LOC: authority.54, the Scheduled Castes