Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramesh Chandra Vs. Randhir Singh and ors.

Decided On : Dec-07-1976

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, The Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co., Paras 15, Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110-CC, Section 96, Section 96, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 96, Raj 317, Section 96, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 110-B., Section 110-CC of the Act, Section 110-CC, Section 110-CC, Section 110-CC

CARDINAL: three, 78,000, 2, 197.2, six, about 3, as many as 1'8, 1972.3, 444, 4., 5., 78,000, 50,000, 420, 28,000, 444, Three-fourths, 6., 458, only two, 8, 24,200, 24,200, 9, two, 150, 16-1s-6d, 21, 10, 300, 50, 60, 55,000, 55,000, 55,000, 366, 11, 12, 61/4, 458, 13, 420, 2, 14, 110, 2, 222, 107, 15, 420, 16, 2, 17, 420, 18, 444, 19, 3, four, about 20, 21, 20, 21, two, 9, only 50, two, 22, 10, 11, 12, 23, 24, 2, 3, 25, 3,000, 3,000, 26, 265, 8), 10,000, 10,000, 27, 147, two, two, 28, 29, 20,000, 3,000, 55,000, 30, 10-10-1972, 3-12-1972, 3,000, 31, 381, 3, 122, 128, 254, 32, 33, 34, 1, two, 35, 36., 37, 444, 38, 420, 444, 458, 11-11-1972

ORG: First Appeals, the Claims Tribunal, Sikandarabad, Sikandarabad Dispensary, the District Hospital, Safdarjang Hospital, Ramesh Chand, Tribunal, Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, Reliance, Ace CJ 514, State, Ace CJ 150, P & H, Sood, Ace CJ 414, AIR 1975 Him Pra 35, Chemical Engineering, Sood & Co., Acc CJ 414, the Railways Department, Government, Ace CJ 334, Government, the Claims Tribunal, The Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Section 110-CC, Ace CJ 154, the Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company, the Claims Tribunal, the Motor Vehicles Act, Tribunal, AIR 19.63 Mad 436, Madras Motor, General Insurance Co. Ltd., Jagdeeswari, AIR 1974 Mad 318, an Insurance Company, Hukam Chand Insurance Co. Ltd., Acc CJ 156, Ins, Society Ltd., Acc CJ 49, Vanguard Insurance Co. Ltd., Vanguard Insurance Co. Ltd., Co. Ltd., Acc CJ 420, the Claims Tribunal, the Insurance Company, F.A.F.O. No, Sri Ramesh Chand, Shisham, Shisham, Balbir (P.W. 4, the Claims Tribunal, Smt, Vanguard Insurance Co. Ltd., Tribunal, Court, The Claims Tribunal, the High Court, M/s. Srinivasa Roadways, Madurai v. Saroja, Division Bench, Cantonment Board, Agra, AIR 1974 All, the Claims Tribunal, Rupees 3,000, the Claims Tribunal, Tribunal, Sikandarabad, the District Hospital, Safdarjang Hospital, Safdarjang Hospital, the Claims Tribunal, Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, AIR 1974 Mad 212, M/s. Assam Corporation, State of Assam v. Urmila Datta, Acc CJ 414, Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Acc CJ 326, Punj & Har, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, the Claims Tribunal, F.A.F.O. No, F.A.F.O. No

DATE: 24th July, 1975, 3480, 10th of October, U.P.P. 1739, 1972, 1st December, 11th December, 1972, 1975, U.P.P. 1739, 1975, 1975, 1975, only 37 years of age, 1974, 1970, 1972, 21 years, a third year, about 2l1/2 years, 1970, 25 years, 1973, 1972, a period of, three years, 1975, 1975, 1969, 1974, 1971, 1971, 1971, 1970, 1971, 1970, 1970, 1973, 1973, 1972, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 35 years old, 1974, six or seven thousand, 1974, 1974, 1974, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975, 1975

PERSON: Bulandshahr, follows;-- Randhir Singh, Raj Bir Singh, Bulandshahr, Hardeep Kaur, Kullu v. S. Kumar, Damyanti Devi v. Sita Devi, Law, Hardeep Kaur, Kullu v. S. Kumar, Damyanti Devi v. Sita Devi, Sahai v. State of U. P., P. A. F. O. No., Krishnan V. Sankaranarayanan, Subhashini Roy, Kesavan Nair v. State Insurance Officer, Orissa Co-operative, Bhagaban Sahu, Orissa, Kasturi Lal v. Prabhakar, Rohini Bhan, Shafali Mukerji, Devi v. Gurbaksh Singh, B. Appa Rao v., Dunna Mukanda Rao, Orissa, L. Krishnan, Man Singh, Balbir, Man Singh, Ram Head Constable, Exs, K. C. Gupta, Dalip Kaur, C. B. Singh, K. C. Gupta, M. R. V. Bus Service, Ravi, Binu Rani, Virendra Kumar v., Gyani Ram, Jai Bhagw.an Bhardwaj, Ram Prakash, Roshan Lal Gupta, K.C. Gupta, D. D. Taiwan, D. D. Talwar, K. C. Gupta

GPE: Bulandshahr, Sikandarabad, New Delhi, F.A.F.O. No, F.A.F.O. No, Haryana, England, Bishambar, Clauses, Gopala, Delhi, F.A.F.O. No, Clauses, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi

QUANTITY: three miles, 20 miles per hour, one foot, one foot, 20 k. m. per hour

FAC: Ramesh Chand, Kailash Wati v. State of, Kailash Wati v. State of, the District Hospital

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first, first, second, first, second

NORP: Punjab, Punjab State, Northern Indian

PERCENT: 8%, 6%, 20%, only 20%, 6%

PRODUCT: S, P.W. 3

WORK_OF_ART: Smt: Saroja

MONEY: , cent per cent

LOC: Atlantic, F.A.F.O. 458 of 1975

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //