Ankur Steels Kurouli Vs. Cegat and ors.

Decided On : Mar-31-2004

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 35G(3, the Excise Act, Chapter 72, Section 35E(2, Section 35G(1, Rule 57G of the Central Excise Rules, Section 35G(3, the Tariff Act, the Central Boards of Revenue Act, the Customs Act, Rule 57G(2, Paras 6, Rule 8(1, Section 5A of the Act, Section 3 of the Act and Rules 7, the Constitution Bench, a Constitution Bench, Section 35G(1, Section 256(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 256(1, the Income Tax Act

ORG: ORDERM, the Hon'ble Tribunal, the Modvat Credit, Machine Builders and Ors, M.S. Bars, the Central Excise Department, the Commissioner (Appeals, the unserviceable Rail, Tribunal, the Central Government, Customs, Warehouse, Government, the High Court, Central Government, Modvat Credit, Tribunal, Tribunal, Machine Builders v. Collector of Central Excise, RLT 817, Tribunal, not.10, Tribunal, Tribunal, CCE, the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Central Government, the Central Government, Modvat Credit under Rule 57G(2, the Central Excise Rules, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Central Government, Modvat Credit, the Central Government, Modvat Credit, Tribunal, Modvat Credit under Rule 57G(2, the Modvat Credit, the Modvat Credit, Modvat Credit, Modvat Credit, Dhiren Chemical Industries, SC, the Supreme Court, follows:'In, the Supreme Court, Vivek Re-Rolling Mills v., Court, the Central Excise Rules, Schedule, the Supreme Court, Collector of Central Excise, Dhiren Chemical Industries, S.L.P., the Supreme Court, SC, Carjaire Equipments India Pvt, Ministry of Finance, UPTC, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Vivek Re-Rolling Mills v., Upper India Steel Mfg, Co. Ltd., Union of India, Haryana High Court, State, the Supreme Court, Amrit Vanaspati Co. Ltd., UPTC, Legislature, Upper India Steel Mfg, Co. Ltd., Union of India, Haryana High Court, Tribunal, Machine Builders v. Collector of Central Excise, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, CIT v., Scindia Steam Navigation Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Kumar & Bros. Ltd., C.I.T., the Central Excise Rules, the Modvat Credit, Department, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Central Excise Rules, the Larger Bench, Machine Builders v. Collector of Central Excise

PERSON: Katju, Shri A.P. Mathur, Shri S.P. Kesharwani, Schedule, Railway Scrap, Schedule, Ravi Steels, Collector, Modvat Credit, Para 2, Kunhayammed v. State, Anr, Anr, Jayesh Containers

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 11.8.2000, 12.7.1998, three, 12, 4.2.1997:'Rule, 1, 1, 1.3.1994, 920, 8, 79, 2002]254ITR554(SC, 8):'As, 15, 8, 53, 888, 48, 1, 9, 10, 72, 681, 6, 359, 252.20, 46, 56, 593, 1996(84)ELT7(SC, 1, 2, 1.As, 3, 1160)28, 42, 598, 1967]63ITR67(SC

DATE: 1944, 1985, 17.7.1992, 1996, Para 17, 1963, 54 of 1963, 1962, 52 of 1962, 1944, 2002, '16, 2002, 20.5.1988, 1944, 2000, 2001, 2004, 1994, '22, 1948, 1992, 10, 11, 12, 13, '23, 19.11.1997

WORK_OF_ART: Collector of Central Excise, Mild Steel, a Gate Pass, a Gate Pass, Collector of Central Excise, 2002, Collector of Central Excise, the Modvat Scheme, Seventh Edition

ORDINAL: second, third, second, third

GPE: Laxmi Rolling Mills v. CEGAT, Kerala, order.27, Kanga, Palkhivala

LOC: Single, Single, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single, Superintendent

PRODUCT: Bench

NORP: Punjab, Punjab