Skip to content

Pratap Chand Purshottam Das Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jan-02-1964

Court: Allahabad

LAW: Section 2(h, Section 2, the Act Section 2, Section 1, The Indian Sale of Goods Act, Section 4(1, the Indian Sale of Goods Act, the Indian Sale of Goods Act, the Indian Law, Section 2, Section 2(h, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2(13, Section 9, Section 10 of the Act, Section 9, Article 19(f, Article 19(g

PERSON: ORDERN.U. Beg, J.1, XV, Purshottam Das, Sri L.S. Kotwall, Lucknow, Schedule, Schedule, Madras, XV, Biha, Provisos, Oswall, Jewellers, Sri L.S. Kotwal, Kanthadbhai, Venkateswaran v. Ramchand Sobhraj Wadhwani, K.K. Kochunni v. State, Kailash Nath v. State of U. P, Lal Harilal Mehta, Firm A. T. R. Mehtab Majid, Ujjam Bai v. State of

GPE: the U. P. Sales, Sri Pratap Chand, Aminabad, LucKnow, England, the U. P. Sales, the U. P. Sales, Delhi, Badlai, the U. P. Sales, Popatlal, India, Bombay

DATE: 1948, 1948, the year 1958-59, the 25th September, 1961, the 25th September, 1961, the year 1948, 1935, 1935, 56, c. 71, 1893, the year 1930, 1935, 1935, 1948, 1948, the year 1947, 48, 1947, 1959]1SCR379, the 6th of December, 1958, 15, 1959, 1953, 1621, the 25th of September, 1961

ORG: the Provincial Legislature, Badlai System, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Provincial Legislature, the Provincial Legislature, Legislature, the Government of India Act, the Provincial Legislature, The Government of India Act, the Parliament of England, the Sale of Goods Act, the Indian Sale of Goods Act, the Government of India Act, the Government of India Act, State, Cannon Dunkerley, the Provincial Legislature under Entry, New India Sugar Mills Ltd., Sales Tax, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Provincial Legislature by Entry, the Government of India Act 1935, the Government of India Act, the Sale of Goods Act, the Supreme Court, the Provincial Legislature, the Provincial Legislature, me.7, the Sale of Goods Act, Collector of Sales-tax v., the Bombay High Court, the South India Metal Works, Rolling Mills, Collector of Monghyr, Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., S.R. Sarkar, Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd., State of Bihar, Himmat, Legislature, the Supreme Court, Co., Court, Uttar Pradesh AIR 1962

CARDINAL: 25,000/-, 25,000/-, two hundred, 25,000/-, 1, 2, 3, 48, 48, 57, 1, one, 48, one, two, 3, 30/-, 2, 3, 2, 25,000/-, 3, 2, 25,000/-, 200, 2, 3, 2, 200, 200, 3, 10, 516, 1960)11, two, 1963]1SCR98, 1983ECR2151D(SC, 1961]1SCR379, 1955]2SCR603, 1954]1SCR1122

PRODUCT: Sale

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English, English, English

NORP: Indian

ORDINAL: seventh

LOC: Madras, Madras, Madras, Madras

WORK_OF_ART: 48 List II, State of Madhya Pradesh

QUANTITY: 1 am

TIME: a valid Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //