Skip to content

Kisan Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd., Ghosi, Mau Vs. State of U.P. and Others - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided On : Sep-05-1997

Court : Allahabad

LAW:

the Excise Rules, Rule 9, Rule 9, Section 11A of the Central Excise, the State Excise Act, the State Excise Act

PERSON:

S. L. Saraf, J.1, Mau, Bihar Distillery, Civil Misc

ORG:

P.O. 2, Allahabad, Industrial Spirit, Ghosi, State, Uttar Pradesh, Distillery, Distillery, Distillery, the Excise Inspector Incharge of Distillery, Distillery, Distillery, Allahabad, the Central Excise Department, Central Excise, the Central Excise Duty, Licensing,, Industrial Development U. p., State, State, The State Legislature, State, Narcotic Drugs, Narcotic Drugs and, butIncluding, State, the Supreme Court, Synthetic Chemicals Ltd., State of U. P, State of U. P, Modi Distillery, Vam Organic Chemicals Limited v. State of U. P, another v. Union of India, the Central Government, Jurisdiction, the State Government, the State Government, Distillery, Chemical Works, The State Government, State, State

DATE:

21st March, 1995, 31331, 1994, 31331, 1944, 50, 50A, 173B, 1910, 1990, 1995, 1997, 1997, 1990, 8th January, 1991, 1910, 1910, 10th October, 1996 levying Rs

TIME:

about 10 p.m.

CARDINAL:

about 12.30, 47.072, 5.000, 9, 173, 36,512.3, 45, 15,35,593.50, 36,512.3, 15,35,593.50, 8 and 51, 8, 51, 84, 5, 1, 109, 6, 523, 2, 984, 2, 879.6, 146, 709, 709, 709, 15,35,593.50

PERCENT:

20%, 94.4%, 94.4%, 94.4%, 94.4%

GPE:

valorem, Incurred, India, India

NORP:

Central Excise, Central Excise, Rules, Indian, Indian, Indian

WORK_OF_ART:

the Excise Inspector

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //