Ranjit Singh and anr. Vs. Naubat and ors. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Jun-16-1902

Court: Allahabad

LAW: Section 257A, Section 257A.3, the Indian Contract Act, Section 134, Section 187, Section 137, Section 137, the Limitation Act, Section 72, the Indian Contract Act, Section 135, Section 2, the Limitation Act, Section 134, Section 137, Section 134, Section 134 of the Contract Act, Section 137, Section 134, the Indian Contract Act, Section 137, Section 134 of the Contract Act, Section 137, the Contract Act, Section 134, Section 135, Section 137, Section 141

PERSON: John Stanley, Banerji, Tej Bahadur, Krishnarav, M. Westropp, Justice Bird, Lal v. Chunni Lal, Oldfield, Tyrrell, Radha, I.L.R., John Edge, Justice Tyrrell

ORDINAL: second, first

CARDINAL: one, 100, Six, Four, 647, two, two, two, 256, five, 310, two

GPE: Harnam, Harnam, Harnam, Harnam, Harnam, Harnam, I.L.R., I.L.R., Bombay, Bombay

DATE: the 30th of March, 1885, the 28th of May, 1886, the 30th of August, 1886, the 30th of August, 1886, annual, the 6th of November, 1886, annual, the 6th of November, 1887, the 6th November, 1892, the 6th of November, 1896, the 7th of February, 1898, the 23rd of August, 1898, the 7th of February, 1898, 1881, one year, three years, 1877, 1886, annual, one month, 1889

NORP: Harnam

ORG: The Court of first instance, Court, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, this High Court, Hazari, Court

LOC: Haja

MONEY: 8 annas per cent