Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Bijai NaraIn Singh and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Decided On : Mar-19-1969

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 139 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 139 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 19. 5, Order 19, Section 141 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 48, Section 6, Section 54, the Amendment Act 38 of 1958, Act 8 of 1963, Section 42, the Scheme of the Act, Section 8, Section 8-A., Section 21 of the Act, Section 19-A. 26, Section 21, Section 19, Section 9-A, Section 9, Section 12, Rule 34, Section 9-A, Section 12, Section 9-B, Section 9-B, Section 21, Rule 34, Rule 26, Section 9-A, Section 22 of the Act, a Full Bench, the Amending Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 38, Section 33 and Rule 26, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 5(2, Section 5(2, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 9-A of the Act, Section 9-A of the Act, Section 9-A, Section 9-A, Section 22, Section 9-A of the Act, Section 20, Section 9-A of the Act, Act 8 of 1963, Section 22, Section 9-A, Section 9-A, Section 9-A, Section 9-A of the Act, Section 139 of the Civil Procedure Code, Section 141, Order 19, the Civil Procedure Code, Section 9-A of the Act, Section 2-A, Section 5(2, Section 9-A of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 9-A of the Act

ORG: B.B. Misra, the U. P. Government, Oath Commissioners, the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act 5, Oath Commissioners, inter alia, the U. P. Government, the U. P. Government, the Consolidation Authorities, Oath Commissioners, Oath Commissioners, Oath Commissioners, Sections 139, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, the State Government, the U. P, Government, Oath Commissioners, Court, Oath Commissioners, Courts of Civil Jurisdiction, Courts of Civil Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Shell Co., AC 275, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Bharat Bank v. Employees, Virindar Kumar Satyawadi, The State of Punjab, Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd., Jaswant Sugar Mills Ltd., Meerut v. Lakshmi Chand, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Jugal Kishore Sinha v., Bank Ltd., the Consolidation Authorities, the Supreme Court, Thakur Jugal Kishore Sinha's, the Division Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, Jugal Kishore Sinha's, the Supreme Court, Court, Jugal Kishore Sinha's, the Division Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, Jugal Kishore Sinha's, the Supreme Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, Registrar, Court, the High Court, Consolidation Authorities, Court, the High Court, the Contempt of Courts Act, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Registrar, Court, Civil Courts, theSupreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Jugal Kishore Sinha's, the Consolidation Authorities, the Settlement Officer (Consolidation, the Settlement Officer (Consolidation, Joint, the Consolidation Authorities, Court, the Oath Commissioners, Oath, Court, Court, the Statement of Principles, the Consolidation Committee, Court, the Statement of principles--, Principles under Section 9, the Consolidation Committee, the Consolidation Committee, the Statement of Principles, the Settlement Officer, Consolidation, the Consolidation Committee, the Consolidation Committee, the Settlement Officer, Consolidation, the Consolidation Committee, the Consolidation Committee, the Consolidation Committee, the Consolidation Committee, Committee under Sections 8, the Consolidation Committee, the Settlement Officer (Consolidation, the Consolidation Committee, the Consolidation Committee, the Consolidation Committee, the Supreme Court, Court, the Consolidation Committee, Court, Court, The Privy-Council, Income Tax, the Bombay Trust Corporation Ltd., the Supreme Court, Express Newspapers Ltd., the Consolidation Authorities, Court, Court, the Consolidation Committee, S. 41, Chapters IX, Oath Commissioners, Judicial, Court at Nagpur, AIR 1935 Nag 125, Court, the Standing Counsel, the Patna High Court, AIR, Court, follows:-- 'Revenue Court, Court, Civil Court, the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, T.P. Mukerjee, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Court, Sec, the Statement of Proposals, the Court of first instance, Court, Legislature, Court, Legislature, East End Dwellings Co. Ltd., Finsbury Borough Council, Courts, the Oath Commissioners, Clause(c, down:--, Court, Magistrate, Court, the State Government, Oath Commissioners, Court of Civil jurisdiction', the Courts of Civil Judicature, Court, Court, J., the Civil P. C., Revenue Courts, Civil Courts, the Oath Commissioners, the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, Misra, the U. P. Consolidation of Holdings Act

CARDINAL: 1, 2, six, 19, 3, 4, 141, 1, 2., 1, 2, 6, 8, two, One, 10, 11, 411, one, 12, 296, 1, 2, 3, two, 4, 5, 6, 13, 14, 1950)NULLLLJ921SC, 1956CriLJ156, 1956CriLJ326, 1962]2SCR339, 1963]2SCR850, 1963)ILLJ524SC, 15, 411, 16, 17, 411, 1967CriLJ1380a, 18, 1967CriLJ1380a, 411, 411, two, 1967CriLJ1380a, two, 1967CriLJ1380a, 1967CriLJ1380a, 2, 411, 1967CriLJ1380a ., 19, 411, 5, 3, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 9, 9, 19, 9, 9, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 4, 21, 1, 2, 1, 3, 28, 2, 29, 2, 30, 31, 32, 26, one, 33, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, 39, 2, 22, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 1, 2, 139, 1, 1, 2, 43

NORP: Mandamus, Rules, fromthese

PRODUCT: Notification, a Full Bench, Sections 9-A, ILR 5 All 406, ILR 5 All 406 (FB, the Full Bench

DATE: June 29, 1968, 1954, March 11, 1968, June 29, 1968, March 11, 1968, effect:-- '1, 1964, 1931, 1962)IILLJ760SC ., 1964, 1964, 1964, 1964, 1956, 6 of 1935, 1964, 1964, 1953, 1954, 1963, 1954, 1963, 1963, 21, 21, 21 days, 15 days, 1964]53ITR250(SC, 1963, 1901, 1883, 1883, '34, 35, 36, J. 37, J. 38, '40, 1952, '41, 42, 1908, J. 44, 45

GPE: Azamgarh, District Judges, District Judges, District Judges, Sita v. State of U. P., Australia, Sankey, Courts, Sankey, Bihar, Bihar, Bihar, District Judges, Bombay, Chapters IX, District Judges, Bade, Singh, Sirdar, Adhivasi, the District Judges

PERSON: G. O. No., G. O., Ram Bharosey Lal v., L. C., Braj Nandan Sinha v., Jyoti Narain, Shyam Sunder, Jagannath Prasad, Mazdoor Sabha v. Hind Cycles Ltd., Ram Bharosey Lal's, Ram Bharosey Lal's, Sitamarhi Central Co-, Ram Bharosey Lal's, Ram Bharosey Lal's, Registrar, Orissa Co-operative, Orissa Co-operative, Orissa Co-operative, Ram Bharosey Lal's, Ram Bharosey Lal's, U. P. Act 8, holdings--, Madras, Madras, Sita Ram's, Madho Prakash, Murli Manohar, M. N. Shukla, Arjun Rautura v., Krishna Chandra Gaipati Narayan Deo, Misra, Beg, J., Asquith, Asquith, Misra, B.D. Gupta, Misra, Mukerji

WORK_OF_ART: English Case, Preamble

ORDINAL: first, first, second, first, Secondly, first, first, first, first, third, Thirdly

QUANTITY: 9-B. Disposal

EVENT: the Provisional Consolidation Scheme--, the Civil Procedure Code

FAC: the Civil P. C.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //