Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Jadunandan Prasad Vs. General Manager, North Eastern Railway, Gorakhpur

Decided On : May-08-1959

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Article 1 of Schedule II, the Amendment Act, the Indian Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 115 ofthe Code of Civil Procedure,1908 (Act V of, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 227 of theConstitutionFifty rupees.(3, section 115 of the Code of CivilProcedure, Article 226 of the Constitution, Second Amendment) Act, Article 1, Chapter II, Section 3, Chapter, Section 49, the Indian Divorce Act, the Indian Divorce Act, Section 3, Section 3, Article 226 of the Constitution.4, Section 4, Section 5, Section 4, Section 4, Article 225 of the Constitution, Section 4, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution.8, Article 226, Section 4, Section 4, Section 3, Section 4, Section 4, Section 3, Section 4, the U. P. Amendment Act, Article 1 of Schedule II, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4.13, Rule 40 of Ch, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4.14, Section 5, Ch. II, Section 5.15, Section 5, Section 5, Ch. II Section 5, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Rule 22, Order 41 C. P. C., Chapter but ones, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Ch. II, Article of the Constitution, Section 3, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article of Constitution, Section 4, Constitution, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution are, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226, Article 226, Article 225, Article 226, Section 115, Section 107, Article 227.'26, Article 226, the Constitution the High Courts, Article 226, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4, Article 226, Article, Section 4, Rule 40, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 4, Article 226, Article 226, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4, Constitution, Article 255, Article 226, Rule 40, Section 225, Rule 40, Section 4, Rule 40, Article 226 of the Constitution, Rule 1 of Ch. VII ofthe Rules of Court

PERSON: J.K. Tandon, Habeas Corpus, i. e., Caveat, jurisdiction;or, Chapter XV, Sri A. P. Pandey, Order, i. e., i. e., i. e., Section 3, Civil, Mahendra Pratap : AIR1956All585, Mongru Mia, Hamid Hasan v., Banwarilal Roy AIR, Civil P. C., Satyanarayanamurti, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule II, Tandon J., Verma

NORP: J.1, Hon'ble

ORG: the State-Legislature, the U. P. Second Amendment Act, the State Legislature, Schedule II, Court, Court, the U. P. Court, the Rules of Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, Theyare, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Civil Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Schedules, Schedules, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Rules of Court, the Rules of Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Standing Counsel, Court, Court, the U. P. Amending Act, Court, Court, Court, Court, Superintendence, Court, Schedule, Court, Court, Schedules, Schedules, Schedules, Sections 3 and 4, Schedules, Schedules, the Rules of Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, the Rules of Court, the Rules of Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bench, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Standing Counsel, the Ordinary Original Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Court, Court, the U. P. High Courts, Court, the High Courts, the Jurisdiction of this Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the New High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the High Court's, State, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, State of U. P. v., Court, Letters Patent, Probate, Court, Court, Ramayya, AIR 1952 Mad 300, the High Court, the High Courts ', the High Courts, the Privy Council, Court, the High Court, Government of India Act, State, Andhra Pradesh, Tribunal, State of Hyderabad, Calcutta, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the State (Legislature, Court, Court, Court, The State Legislature, Legislature, the U. P. Court Fees

DATE: 1870, 1958, 1st of April 1959, 1913, 1913, 1956, 1908, 1908, 1958, 1870, 1966, 1865, the next higher quarter, 1952, 1870, 5-11-1953, today, 1870, 1958, 1958, 1870, 1948, 25, Para 9, 1948, 1948, 1947 PC 90, 1870, 1958

CARDINAL: One, Sixty two, eight, One, Five, Three, tohave, five, Five, 50/-, 50/-, 3/12/-, 3/12/-, 50/-, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, one, four, four, eight, eight, twelve, twelve, one, 5, 1870.'7, 5/-, 5/-is, 2, 3, one, 4, 5, two, one, 110, 26, 6, 7, 9, 10, 26, 15, One, 9, 23, 9, 701, 123, 226, 228, 40, 50/-, 5/-, 3

QUANTITY: twelve annas.(3

ORDINAL: first, firstly, first, second, first, second, first, second, first, first

GPE: Clause, jurisdiction.22, the U. P. High Courts, England, Halsbury, Telangana, Bombay, Telangana, Articles 225

WORK_OF_ART: are-(1, Schedule II

LOC: Ch, Ch, Ch, Madras, Madras

FAC: Budge Budge Municipality, the Andhra Pradesh case.27

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //