Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Laxmi Chand Agarwal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.
Decided On : Nov-28-1960
Court : Allahabad
LAW: Section 69-A of the U. P. Municipalities Act, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 68, Section 58, Section 69, Section 58, Section 69-A, Section 69-A, Section 69-A ', Section 69, Section 69, Section 69-A, Section 69-A, Section 69-A, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 51, Section 50, Section 51-A, Section 69, Section 69-A of the Act, Article 14, Section 69-A of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution or, Constitution, Section 69-A of the Act, Constitution, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 89-A, Section 58, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 58, Section 58, Section 58 of the Act, Section 69-A., Section 69-A, Section 69, Section 69-A, Section 69-A
PERSON: Jagdish Sahai, Hapur, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri, S. N. Kakkar, S. C. Khare, Shambhu Prasad, Kakkar, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri Tara Chand Modi, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Dimes, i. e., H. H. Marshall, Serjeant, Dale, H. H. Marshall, 1959 Ed, Simmonds Edition, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. G. Mittal, Singh v.State of U. P., De Keyser's, Sri Mittal, ho, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Bias, Sri Mittal, Kakkar, Sri Mittal
NORP: J.1, Hari, Jagannath Prasad
ORG: Laxmi Chand Agarwal, the Municipal Board, Board, Board, the State Government, The State Government, Court, the State Government, Sri Tara Chand Modi, Sri Tara Chand Modi, the State Government, The House of Lords, Own Supreme Court, State of U. P. v. Mohd, AIR 1958, Nageswarrao, Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1959, Courts of Justice, Legislature, Tribunal, Laws of England, Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Legislature, the State Government, the State Government, Legislature, Executive, Board, Board, the State Government, Department of the State Government, Board, Legislature, AIR 1957, Parliament, Royal Hotel, AC 508, Statute, Board, the State Government, Board, theState Government, Board, Division Bench, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, State of M. P. v. M. Hossonjee and Sons, MPC, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Administrator of a District Board, the Administrator of the Board, Badri Prasad Rastogi v., District Board, LJ, Court, the U. P. Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal, theGovernor, Tribunal, the Government and Government, Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Court
DATE: the year 1931, January, 1958, 23rd of November, 1958, 1852, 1376, 1959, 1877, fqllows:-'69-A., '10, 1920, 1957, 1957, 1952, 1954
CARDINAL: only one, me.3, one, 3, 38, 2, 558, 41, 11, 67, 123, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 67, 69, 5, 4, 9, 1, 1, 4, 4, 301, two, two, 559, 9.14, 3, 412, 4, 681, 629
EVENT: SC 86
ORDINAL: first, second
GPE: Halsbury, Mukhtar, England, Hayles, Police, Bombay, Mirzapur
WORK_OF_ART: 1955 Mad 1