Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Laxmi Chand Agarwal Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Decided On : Nov-28-1960

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 69-A of the U. P. Municipalities Act, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 68, Section 58, Section 69, Section 58, Section 69-A, Section 69-A, Section 69-A ', Section 69, Section 69, Section 69-A, Section 69-A, Section 69-A, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 51, Section 50, Section 51-A, Section 69, Section 69-A of the Act, Article 14, Section 69-A of the Act, Article 14 of the Constitution or, Constitution, Section 69-A of the Act, Constitution, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 89-A, Section 58, Section 69-A of the Act, Section 58, Section 58, Section 58 of the Act, Section 69-A., Section 69-A, Section 69, Section 69-A, Section 69-A

PERSON: Jagdish Sahai, Hapur, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri, S. N. Kakkar, S. C. Khare, Shambhu Prasad, Kakkar, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri Tara Chand Modi, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Dimes, i. e., H. H. Marshall, Serjeant, Dale, H. H. Marshall, 1959 Ed, Simmonds Edition, Sri K. C. Mittal, Sri K. G. Mittal, Singh v.State of U. P., De Keyser's, Sri Mittal, ho, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Sri Mittal, Bias, Sri Mittal, Kakkar, Sri Mittal

NORP: J.1, Hari, Jagannath Prasad

ORG: Laxmi Chand Agarwal, the Municipal Board, Board, Board, the State Government, The State Government, Court, the State Government, Sri Tara Chand Modi, Sri Tara Chand Modi, the State Government, The House of Lords, Own Supreme Court, State of U. P. v. Mohd, AIR 1958, Nageswarrao, Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1959, Courts of Justice, Legislature, Tribunal, Laws of England, Court, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Legislature, the State Government, the State Government, Legislature, Executive, Board, Board, the State Government, Department of the State Government, Board, Legislature, AIR 1957, Parliament, Royal Hotel, AC 508, Statute, Board, the State Government, Board, theState Government, Board, Division Bench, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, State of M. P. v. M. Hossonjee and Sons, MPC, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, The State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the Administrator of a District Board, the Administrator of the Board, Badri Prasad Rastogi v., District Board, LJ, Court, the U. P. Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal, theGovernor, Tribunal, the Government and Government, Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Court

DATE: the year 1931, January, 1958, 23rd of November, 1958, 1852, 1376, 1959, 1877, fqllows:-'69-A., '10, 1920, 1957, 1957, 1952, 1954

CARDINAL: only one, me.3, one, 3, 38, 2, 558, 41, 11, 67, 123, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 67, 69, 5, 4, 9, 1, 1, 4, 4, 301, two, two, 559, 9.14, 3, 412, 4, 681, 629

EVENT: SC 86

ORDINAL: first, second

GPE: Halsbury, Mukhtar, England, Hayles, Police, Bombay, Mirzapur

WORK_OF_ART: 1955 Mad 1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //