Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vishwa Mittra Vs. Dist. Judge, Jhansi and ors.

Decided On : Sep-30-1955

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Rule 22, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 228 of the Constitution, Section 115, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution in this Court, Article 226 of the Constitution their Lordships of the Supreme Court, Article 228 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, the Cantonments Act, Rule 43.The, Article 226, Section 82, Section 81, Section 82 of the Act, Section 82, Article 329 of the Constitution, the Cantonments Act provides:'If, Section 171B, Section 171C, Section 20, Section 20, the Amending Act 7 of, Section 20, Section 19, Section 19, Section 20, the Cantonments Act, Section 82, Representation of the People Act

ORG: ORDERMehrotra, the Cantonment Board, SriAllah Rakha, Cantonment Rules, Court, the High Court, Court, Asiatic Engineering Co., Courts, the High Court, tnis Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, AIR 1952, SC, the High Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, SC, the Supreme Court, follows:'On, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Court, Legislature, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, not.10, Judicial, the State Government, Court, the Bombay High Court, Court, Constitutionwas, Court, Court, follows:'On, Court, the Rajasthan High Court, AIR, Patna High Court, AIR, the Supreme Court, SC 610, Lordships of the Supreme Court, the variousHigh Courts, Lordships, AIR 1953 Bom, AIR 1953, AIR, Allahabad, the Patna High Court, Court, AIR, S.C. 210, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, Bench, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, SC 610, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Court

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules

PERSON: Sri Jagdish Rai, Nos, Jhansi, Sri Jagdish Rai, Jhansi, Jhansi, Sri Jagdish Rai v., Vishwa Mittra).3, C. P. C., Achhru Ram', Pratab, V. Bhargava, Hari Vishnu Kamath v. Ahmad Sayed Ishaque', Certiorari, Certiorari, Certiorari, Sheo Kumar, V. G. Oak, Sitararn Hirachand v. Yograjsing', Chagla C. J., Madan Mohan v. Bankatlal', Ram Charan Singh', Bhikaji Keshao v. Brijlal, Jagan Nath v., Jaswant Singh', I. P. C.

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 3, 2, nominated.12-10-1954, 3, 2, 1, 23, 3.It, Two, two, 99, one, two, 243, 1, 2, 3, One, One, one, 43, less than five, five, five, 633, One, 636, 293, 614:'These, three, 293, 633, one, 47, One, 2, ten, 19, 1, one, one, 633, 633

DATE: October 1954, 13-10-1954, seven days, '11, January 1952.The, 1954 Raj 145(F, 1954, 47, Rule 43, Rule 43, 1949, the year 1949

WORK_OF_ART: 'Election Petition No. 11 of 1954

PRODUCT: tne, a Full Bench

ORDINAL: Firstly, first, Firstly, secondly

LOC: District

GPE: Singh v. State of U. P., Bombay

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //