Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Kisan Co-operative Sugar Factory Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Decided On : Feb-28-2007
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Chapter 72, Chapter 32, Rule 13, Section 11AC, Rule 13, Rule 13, Section 11AB, Rule 173Q
CARDINAL: 1, 29, 1944.2, 27-3-2004, 135, 6, 78, 581, five, 13, 2.Reliance, 78, 499, 57Q(1, 23, 3, 27-3-2004, 2, 2, 2, 10,000/-, 10,000/-, ten thousand, allowed.10, 29, 1,35,666.33, 1,35,666.33, 1944.According, 3-4-2002, 3-4-2003, 1,33,666.33, 10,000/-, ten thousand
ORG: the Commissioner (Appeals, the Cenvat Credit Rules, the Tribunal in Simbhaoli Sugar Mills, the Cenvat Credit Rules, CCE, the Larger Bench, CCE, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Tribunal, CCE, DSM Ltd., Tribunal, the Cenvat Credit Rules, Clauses, Simbhaoli Sugar Mills, Malvika Steel Ltd., Tribunal, Sugar Mills, Malvika Steels Ltd., the Cenvat Credit Rules, Tribunal, CCE, DSM Ltd., Modvat, The Commissioner (Appeals, Cenvat, Cenvat, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Central Excise Rules, the Commissioner (Appeals, Appellate, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Cenvat
DATE: April 2003 to December 2003, 8311, 1985, Rule 2(b, 2002, 2001, 1239, 2002, 2007, 60, 2007, 2002, 2002, 2007, Rule 2(b, 2002, 30-9-2004, 20-11-2003, 23-11-2003, 20-11-2003, 20-11-2003
WORK_OF_ART: the Larger Bench, Surya Roshni
PERSON: Jaypee Rewa Plant, CCE Raipur, Cement Works, Jaypee Rewa Plant, Bench, Noida, misconceivedCCE Chandigarh v. Modern Steels Ltd., Noida, Rules 2, jurisdiction.13
GPE: Jaipur, Del., law.6, Del., Clause, Mod, Counsel
NORP: CESTAT
PRODUCT: Rule 2(b, Rule 173Q
LOC: Cenvat