Gauri Shankar Vs. Nathu Lal and ors.

Decided On : Jan-25-1951

Court : Allahabad

LAW: Section 4, Section 13 of the Act, Section 35, Encumbered Estates Act, Section 12, Section 35, Article 105, Limitation Act, &, Section 12, Article 83, Article, Section 28, Section 29, Article 66 or, Article 57 &, Article 116, Limitation Act, Article 116 of the Act, Section 28, Section 28, Article 116, Limitation Act, Article 115 of the Act, &, the Encumbered Estates Act &, Article 115, Article 83 of the Act, Article 83 of the Act, Article 115 or Article 116, Limitation Act, & time, Article 83, Article 83, Article 115, Limitation Act, Article 83 of the Act

PERSON: Mushtaq Ahmad, Manna Lal, mtgor, mtgees, Lala Manna, mtgees, mtgees, mtgees, 2115/-, A. I. R., Jogini Mohun v. Bhootnath, Venkataswami, Venkatasubhayya A. I. R., Chandra Narayan, A. I. R., Lordships, the H. C., Joginee Mohun v. Bhootnath, Sailendra Nath v., Keshab Ghandra, P. C., Chandra Narayan, Lachhmi Prasad, Ram Lal A. I. R., Raj Bahadur, Suraj Baksh, A. I. R., I. C. 792, I. L. R., Musafir Tewari, mtgees, Limitation Act.36, Tilak Ram v. Suresh Singh, Bajpai J., Nisa Begum v. Pratap Singh, I. C. 353, A. C. J., P. B., Tilak Ram v. Suresh, 583 P. C.) &, Abdul Majid v., Abdul Rashid, Raghubar Rai v. Jai Raj, F. B. case, Basant Singh, Sulaiman C. J., Raghubar Rai v. Jai Raj, I. C. 244

NORP: J.1, Dotti Karan, English, premature.46

DATE: 11-11-1934, 1292-8/-, 2115, 28-9-1925, 20-9-1938, discharged.6, 20-8-1939, 2115/-, 1292-8-0/-, 26 1-1943, 14-9-1943, 14-9-1943, six years, 46 Mad, 10) 1923 Mad, 19) 1932 Mad, 55 Mad, 8) 1921, '25, 26) 1939, the three years', 26) 1939 Nag, 1935, 26 1-1943, 14-9-1943, 11-11-1934, 11-11 1934, three years, 36 Mad, 36 Mad, 34, 44, 11-11-1934

ORG: Lala Nathu Lal & Faqir Chand, Jagannath & Madho Prasad, Jagannath & Madho Prasad mtgees, principal & interest & relates, the Board of Eevenue, Govt., Govt, Articles 115 & 116, the Judicial Committee, Lordships, the Calcutta H. C., Act &, Inderdeo, The Avadh Chief Court, Jageshwarprasad v. Mool Chand A. I. R., Kesari Ram, the Judicial Committee, the P. C. casethus:'It, the Judicial Committee, the P. C. Izat-un-Nisa Begum v. Pratap Singh

CARDINAL: 1, two, one, 14,707-8/-, 27-4-1933, 47, 14,707-8/-, 11-11-1934, 2, 11-11-1934, 2, 2, 2,200/-, 624, 47/-, 25, 20-8-1939, 25, 11-11-1934, 2, 13,963-5, 2, 8667-11, 3, 47/-, 4, 11-11-1934, 5, 13,963-5, 14,057-3-0/-.10, two, 26, 20,000/-, 15,000/-.13, 11-11-1934, 11-11-1934, 11-11-1934, 27-4-193S, 18,350/-, 15,000/-.17, 6-5-1943, 23,676, transferee, 23, 6-5-1943, two, three, 2, 3, Two, 11-11-1934, three, three, 435, 447, 29, 654, 311, 507, two, two, one, 48, 8), 23, 29, 654, one, 48, 8), 502, 18, 429, 13, 138, 90, 57, 29, 11-11-1934, 26, 11-11-1934, 26, three, 11-11-1934 &, 2, 26, 3, two, 14,707-8-0/-, 2, 292-8, 14,707-8-0/-.34, 11-11-1934, two, 14.707/8/-, 26, 36, 203, 31, 583, 348, 12, transferee, 38, 348, 12, 36, 203, 31, 39, 11-11-1934, two, 42, One, 34, 429, 43, 14,707-8-0/-, 11-11-1934, 3, one, 292-8, 14,707-8-0/-, 26

PRODUCT: 1 & 2, Prasad

ORDINAL: first, second, First, second, first, first, third, first, second, first, second, first, first, third, third, first, third

GPE: claim.16, case.19, ceases.20, Mathura, Prashad, the H. C., Mathura, basis.33, Bennet, P.C., Raghunatha v. Sadagopa, Raghunatha v.

FAC: Rama Rao v. Vedayya

QUANTITY: 171 I. C. 965

EVENT: Limitation Act, the Encumbered Estates Act

PERCENT: 14 I. C.

LOC: Naima Khatoon