Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. G. Krishna
Decided On : Mar-02-2005
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Rule 3(1)(i, Rule 3(1)(i, Article 226 of the Constitution the High Court, Article 226 of Constitution of India, Article 226/227 of Constitution of India
PERSON: G. Bikshapathy, J.1, Railways, Enquiry Officer, Lalit Popli v., Canara Bank, R.S. Saini, Bhagat Ram v. State of Himachal Pradesh, Bhagubhai Balubhai Patel, Kumar Kindra, Delhi Administration, Kuldeep Singh, Yoginath D. Bagde, Balaji Traders, Ponnuri Lakshmaiah, sustainable6, Sri G. Kirishna, Sri G. Krishna, Railways, Sri G. Krishna, Lalit Popli's, B.K. Meena, R.S. Saini's, Sree Ram Rao, Iron Works, Bgagubhai Balubhai Patel, Kumar Kindra, Delhi Administration, Nand Kishore, Kumar Arora, Kuldip Singh v. Commissioner of Police, Chandramohan Rao, Chandramohan Rao, Goel
LOC: South Central Railway, the South Central Railways
ORG: the Central Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, Tribunal, EFT, Train No., the Railway Employees Conduct Rules, the Central Bureau of Investigation, EFT, the Appellate Authority, Tribunal, Standing Counsel, Railways, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Counsel, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Central Administrative Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Central Bank of India v., Bharat Iron, Labour, ATJ, SC, Tribunal, Tribunal, CTI/Sleeper Coaches, CTI, CTI/Sleeper Coaches/ Vijayawada, CTI/Sleeper Coaches, CTI, EFT, EFT, EFT, the Indian Railways, Railways, Railway Employees Conduct Rules, Tribunal, Court, The Supreme Court, Standing Counsel, the Central Government, Judicial, an Appellate Authority, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Courts, Court, Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Counsel, Court, Court, State of Andhra Pradesh, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Central Bank of India, Labour, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, The High Court, Appellate Court, the High Court, Indian Oil Corporation, the High Court, the High Court, High Court, the High Court, High Court, Court, the North Wales Police v. Evans, Court, EFT, Tribunal, Court, EFT, Tribunal, EFT, Tribunal, the Government Examiner for Questioned Documents, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Government Examiner, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Disciplinary Authority, the Disciplinary Authority, the Government Examiner of Questioned Documents, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Standing Counsel, the Central Government, Court, the Central Administrative Tribunal, Tribunal, Court
GPE: O.A., C.T.I., Vijayawada, C.T.I., Ajit Jain v., Chirala, Vijayawada, Rajasthan v., regard.10, Bihar
DATE: 80 of 2001, the period 1992 to 1995, 6004, 14.6.1995, 2.12.1995, 230340, 1966, 2001, 30.10.2003, 2003)IIILLJ558SC, 2000, 24.7.1998, 741081, 2.12.1995, 230340, 1966.'It, 1984)IILLJ517SC, 2000, 1982, 14.6.1995, 14.6.1995, Para 17
CARDINAL: 30.10.2003.2, 13, 4.8.1995, 7.8.2000, 80, 2003)IILLJ324SC, 1999)IILLJ1415SC .4, 1964)ILLJ38SC, 1976]2SCR280, 1984)IILLJ517SC, 1999)ILLJ604SC, 1, 208, 2002(2)ALD147, 13, one, one, 146/-, 1997)ILLJ746SC, 1964)IILLJ150SC, 1976]2SCR280, 1, 208.11, 3, 15, one, 2.12.1993
WORK_OF_ART: State of Punjab
FAC: Prakash Chand Jain, Prakash Chand Jain
NORP: Rules
PRODUCT: Para 16
EVENT: Para 15
ORDINAL: 2nd