Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ashish Developers and Builders (P) Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority

Decided On : Apr-03-2001

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Chapter XXC, the Income Tax Act, the Finance Act, Chapter XX, Chapter-XX-A, section 6, the Finance Act, the Income Tax Act, section 269UL(3, section 269UC(2, section 269UC(2, Chapter XX-C of the Act, Chapter XX-C, section 269UB, section 269UD of the Act

ORG: Nayak, NOC, Elichibaiguda, Bakaram, Hyderabad, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, DBR Mills Ltd., DBR, DBR, DBR, the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation, the Special Officer & Competent Authority, Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation, DBR, the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation, DBR, DBR, City Civil Court, DBR, the Appropriate Authority, Sultan Bazar, Sri Niketan Apartments, Bagh Elchibaiguda,, Hyderabad-Reg, DBR Mills Ltd., M/s. DBR Mills Ltd., DBR Mills Ltd., Sd/-(B. Arulappa)Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Appropriate Authority, NOC, the Central Government, DBR, the Central Government, NOC, the Central Government, NOC, Appropriate Authority Ltd., Tanvi Trading & Credits, DLF Universal Ltd., Appropriate Authority, Union of India, IOL Ltd., Ushadevi Radhakrishna Pathi, ITR, the Income Tax Department, NOC, the Supreme Court, Tanvi Trading & Credits, P) Ltd., Chamundi Hotels, Appropriate Authority, NOC, The Supreme Court, Tanvi Trading & Credits, the Union of India, the High Court, the Apex Court, NOC, NOC, the Central Government, the Central Government, Fiscal Policy, LTFP, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, Tanvi Trading & Credits, P) Ltd., the Supreme Court, Tanvi Trading& Credits, the Supreme Court, Tribunal, DBR, Tanvi Trading & Credits, P) Ltd., DLF Universal Ltd., IOL Ltd., Appropriate Authority, the Supreme Court, Appropriate Authority, Tanvi Trading & Credits, the Delhi High Court, Tanvi Trading & Credits, Appropriate Authority, High Courts, Tanvi Trading & Credits, the Delhi High Court, the High Court, Appropriate Authority, Tanvi Trading & Credits, Court, the Delhi High Court, The Union of India, the High Court, Legislature, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, The Delhi High Court, the Central Government, The Calcutta High Court, Dwarkanath Chatterjees, the Bombay High Court, the Central Government, Tanvi Trading & Credits, the Delhi High Court, the Central Government, the Income Tax Department, the Karnataka High Court, Chamundi Hotels, the Supreme Court, Tanvi Trading & Credit, the Supreme Court, NOC, the Supreme Court, DBR, the Supreme Court, NOC, Elichibaiguda, Bakaram, Hyderabad

CARDINAL: 26-8-1999, 22.5, 38, 1,000, 2, 2, 120, 1, 2, 2, 3-12-1998, 37, 17-12-1998, 37, 37, 37, 40,000, 3,000, 60,00,000, Sixty, 4.60, 8, 4.60, 37, 1, 269, 4, 25, 24, 11-2-1999, 9-3-1999, 26-8-1999, 26-8-1999, 2nd, 5, 4, 37, 17-12-1998, 25, 24, 11, 19, 37, only two, 1991]191ITR307(SC, 2000]243ITR730(SC, 1998]230ITR454(KAR, 1995]211ITR10(Delhi, 1995]213ITR470(Cal, 1996]217ITR52(Bom, 223, 245.5, 37, only two, 1997]225ITR590(KAR, 26-8-1999, two, 308)It, 37, two, 269U, 269A, two, 1991]188ITR623(Delhi, 4, 1998]230ITR442(SC, 4, 7, 5.50, 37, 30-10-1995, 11-12-1995, 1991]191ITR307(SC, 1991]188ITR623(Delhi, 446, 230, 4, 1991]188ITR623(Delhi, 1991]191ITR307(SC, 308, two, 4, 448, 4, 4, 3, 4, 4, 4, 269UC, 3, only two, 3, 3, 466)10, 19)11, 475)12, 57)In, 628)13, 37, only two, two, 851)In, 37, 37, 26-8-1999, 26-8-1999

DATE: 1961, 20-10-1967, 1976, annual, 1992, 1999, the 1st, 10-8-1999Please, 1997, 1986, 79-1995, 1995, 17-1995, 1995, 269UD, 269UL, a period of, fifteen days, the period of fifteen days, 1995, 269UD, 269UD, 1978]2SCR272

ORDINAL: 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 1st, 2nd, 1st, 1st, 1st, third, second, first, firstly, secondly, 2nd, 1st, 1st, 2nd

PERSON: Chenai, K.S. Chenai, Chenai, Nos, Sadan, Sri Rajkumar Malpani, Madam, Sri B. Satyanarayana Murthy, Bangalore, Shri Y. Ratnakar, Ramanlal B. Pandya v. Union, Savitri Devi v. Appropriate Authority, Dwarkanath Chatterjee, Ltd.s, Chapter-XX-C, 269UO, Ramanlal B. Pandya, Savitri Devi, Dwarkanath Chatterjee, Sunil Kumar, Universal Ltd.s, A. Sadarangani v. Government, Sadarangani, 269UD, Bill, Savitri Devis, Mitra, Ltd.s, Ltd.s, Ltd.s, Ltd.s, Universal Ltd.s, Shri Y. Ratnakar, Universal Ltd.s, Mohinder Singh Gill, Universal Ltd.s, nisi

GPE: O.S., O.S., UC, Block, Koramangala, Shapoorwadi, Adarshnagar, A.R., Kumar, Jagdish, Ramanlal R. Pandyas

QUANTITY: 16 acres, 6.5 acres, 22.5 acres

PRODUCT: S.C Prasad, 269UC, 269UC, Section 269UC, 269UC, 269UC, 269UC, 269UC, 269UC, 269UC, 269UF, 269UG, 269UD, Section 269UD

WORK_OF_ART: 269UC of the Act, 269UC of the Act, 269UC of the Act

LOC: Madras

FAC: the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, File No AA/Hyd/1(85)/4/98-99

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //