Semantic Analysis by spaCy
thejo Engineering Services (P) Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.
Decided On : Nov-15-2006
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India.2 The, Section 6A of the Central Sales Tax Act, the Central Act', Section 9(2, the Central Act, Section 3(a, Section 6A of the Central Act, Section 9(2, the Central Act, the Bengal Municipal Act, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution of India
PERSON: ORDERG.S. Singhvi, Ponneri, Athipetti, Sri Shaffin, Counsel, 2,08,93,930, Amalendu Das, Chandan Nagar
ORG: Joint, CT, Court, Gudur in Andhra Pradesh, State, CST Act, Court, the Supreme Court, Dunlop India Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, Court
CARDINAL: 3, 1, 2, 2, 1956.3, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 2006.7, 3, 25,07,272, 3, 1984]146ITR624(SC, 1985ECR4(SC, 2, 1.10
FAC: Tamil Nadu
DATE: year 2001-02, 1956, February 18, 2003, two years, six months, August 29, 2005, annual, March 21, 2006, March 31, 2006, June 29, 2006, August 29, 2005, March 21, 2006, June 29, annual, monthly, the end of the year, March 31, 2006, March 21, 2006, March 31, 2006
NORP: inter-State, inter-State, inter-State
MONEY: 12 per cent, 12 per cent
GPE: stay.6, Counsel, Siliguri Municipality, West Bengal
ORDINAL: first, second