Madhava Hytech Engineers Private Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi), South Central Railways and anr.

Decided On : Apr-09-2002

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 137, the Limitation Act, Section 11(6, Section 11, the Limitation Act, Section 43 of the Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 8(1)(a, Section 20 of the Act, Section 8(a, Section 20, Section 20(4, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11, the Constitution of the Arbitration Tribunal, Article 136 of the Constitution, Section 11(6, Section 11, Section 11(6, a Constitution Bench, Section 11, Section 11, Section 12, Section 13, Section 13, Section 11, Section 16, Section 16, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11(6, Section 11, Article 136, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Arbitration Act, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 9(11)(e, Section 11, the Constitution Bench

PERSON: Ananda Reddy, Meter Guage, Broad Guage, Sri T. Seshachalapathi, Sri B. Ashok, Award, Southern Railway, Mohan Rao, Scale 8, G. Ramachandra Reddy, Counsel, Bench, Prahallad Moharana, Orissa 19, Southern Railway, Madras, Secunderabad, Sri Justice A.Seetaram Reddy

NORP: J.1, Mandamus

ORG: the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Guage Conversion of UBL-LD Section, Bridge Nos.87, Respondents, the General Conditions of Contract, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Clauses 34, Conditions, the General Conditions of Contract, the Divisional Engineer, No.63/CAD/C/SC/l995, Respondents, Arbitral Tribunal, Respondents, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Respondents, Respondents, MG, BG, Respondents, the Variation Statement, Respondents, Engineer, Engineer, Respondents, the General Conditions, Respondents, Court, Counsel, Bench, the Supreme Court, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd, Rani Construction, SC, Court, Court, Court, the General Conditions, Respondents, Counsel, Standing Counsel, Court, Counsel, Court, Court, Respondents, the General Conditions, Counsel, AIR, Kerala 163, Madhya Pradesh High Court, Subhash Projects and Marketing Ltd., Court, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, Respondents, the Apex Court, Nandyal Co-operative, Spinning Mills Ltd, the Administrative Head, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Court, under:'The Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Supreme, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Apex Court, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd v. M/s. Mehul Construction Company, The Apex Court, Sections 13, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitration Law, Court, Court, AdorSamia, Court, Sundaram Finance Ltd., Court, Apex Court, Datar Switchgears Limited, Tata Finance Limited, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Court, Court, the Apex Court, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd., Rani Construction, The Apex Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Appointment of Arbitrators, the Chief Justice of, Tribunal, Konkan Railway Corporation Limited, Mehul Construction Company, Court, Court, M. Narsimhulu v. Council of Scientific, Industrial Research, Court, Court, Asia Resorts Ltd., Usha Breco Ltd., AIR2002SC55, the Apex Court, Arbitration Act, Court, the Orissa High Court, Union of India, AIR 1996, Standing Counsel, Court, M/s. Subhash Projects & Marketing Ltd., South Eastern Coalfields Ltd., Kamala Solvent v. Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd., Court, 3Xb, under:'It, Railway, an Arbitrator/ Umpire, Arbitration, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, M/s. Subhash Projects and Marketing Ltd., the Apex Court, Court, Kamala Solvent, Court, Court, Ashok Engineering Company Engineers and Contractors, SCR, the General Conditions of Contract.16, the Apex Court, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd, the Apex Court

DATE: 1996, 27-01-1995, a period of, three months, the period of three months, April 1995, 22-03-2001, the 1st, three months, 30 days, April 1995, 20-03-1997, the period of, three years, 2002, three years, the period of, three years, 2001, March 1997, 1993, 1940, 15 days, 1996, 15, 16, under 1996 Act, 1996, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, the period of, thirty days, the period of, thirty days, the period of, thirty days, the period of, thirty days, 1996, the period of, three years, 1940, 1940, 2002, 30 days

CARDINAL: 91, 19-2-1996, 20-3-1997, 22, 12/19-8-1997, 2, 22, 6-12-1997, 63, 15-4-1998, 27-4-1998, 20-3-1995, 21, 27, 16, 15-7-1995, 1,87,73,875-76, 26, 2, 2, 2, 1994]3SCR808, two, 1, 6, 2, 6, 6, 6, 1999]1SCR89, 2000)8SCC151, one, 24, two, three, 9, 1, 2, 64

LOC: Respondent, Madras, Respondent, Single, Single, Single, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

PERCENT: 25%, 25%, 25%, 25%, 25%

ORDINAL: 2nd, First, Secondly, first, first, first, second, 1998(5)ALD582, 1999(3)ALD422

PRODUCT: Respondent, South Eastern Coalfield Ltd, Appellant

QUANTITY: 6-2-

GPE: Act.3, Counsel, G.M., Para-27, G.M., Manipal

EVENT: Clauses 63