Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Ajai Kumar Roy Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Decided On : Apr-10-2003
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Section 101(1, the Army Act, Section 101(1, Section 101(1, Section 26, the Army Act, Section 101(1, Section 101(1, the Army Act, Section 14, Section 16, Section 17 or Section 20, Section 21;ii, the Army Act, Section 28, Section 50, the Army Act, the Army Act, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Officers, the Army Act, the Army Act, The Army Act, the Army Code, Section 15, Section 9 or Section 10, the Army Act, Section 101, the Army Act, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Constitution
PERSON: G. Yethirajulu, Habeas Corpus, Roy, Soldier Dharmender, Kumar Tiwari, offences.2, xxx(e, Kumar Tiwari, Tiwari, Lakshmana Rekha'
NORP: J.1, writing?2
GPE: Ajai, Clause, decision.19, Clause, India, Sunil Batra
ORDINAL: 3rd, 3rd, 3rd, 3rd
TIME: 1400 hours, about 1400 hours, about 10 a.m., forty-eight hours, 48 hours
DATE: 16-11-2002, 17-11-2002, 1950, three years, 16-11-2002, 1950, 1969, 1950, two years, 1968, 12730, 2000, Para 5, 64184, 1955, 64181, Para 31, 1949, 1969, quarter, 1950, seven years, seven years, 1675, 1978
ORG: Court, Non-Commissioned, the Indian Army, Calcutta, the Summary Court-Martial, COD, Agra, a Court of Enquiry, the Court of Inquiry under Rule 180, Army Rules, the Court of Inquiry, Army Rules, Court, the Border Security Force Rules, Commandant, Court, Act, the Border Security Force Act, the Commanding Officer, Judicial, Army, Armed Forces, the Armed Forces, the Central Reserve Police Force Act, Force, Force, the Border Security Force Rules, Commandant, Commandant, Court, BSF Rules, Army, the Supreme Court, Delhi Administration, AIR 1978
CARDINAL: 16-11-2002, 2, 3, 29, 15,000/-, 1, 21-11-2002, 1, 7, 101, 1, 9, 40, 40., 1, 10, 36, 36, 1, 1, 12, 50, 13, 40, 3, 4, 14, 21, 2, 21, 31, 31, 1, 15, 1, 1, 33, 33, 1, 3, 24, 64, 25, 15,000/-, 31(2, quarter
WORK_OF_ART: Officers, Officers
PRODUCT: Officers, Cri LJ 1741