Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Lanco Kondapalli Power Private Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies Act, 1956 Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Ministry of Finance, Represented by Secretary,

Decided On : Dec-16-2008

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Customs Act, Section 129-A of the Act of, Section 129-E of the Act of, Section 129-A of the Act of 1962, Section 129-E of the Act, Circular, Section 35C(2A, Section 129E of the Act of, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226 of the Constitution of India

PERSON: Sanjay Kumar, J.1, Bangalore, Heard Sri D. Prakash Reddy, Sri A. Rajashekhar Reddy, K.N. Guruswami Oil Mills Ltd., K.N. Guruswami Oil Mills Ltd.'s, Ganga Enterprises, Anr, Mahatma Gandhi Sahakra Sakkare Karkhane, Anr, Anr, Anr, Anr, Ernakulam, Anr, Secunderabad v. Power Grid Corporation Of India Ltd., Ashok Sharda v., Ashok Sharda's, Bangalore, Kumar Singh

ORG: Bank Guarantee, Central Excise, Customs, Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, Customs, Kakinada, the Shinhan Bank Limited, Bank Guarantee, Central Excise, Customs, Bank Guarantee, Customs, Kakinada, Customs, Court, Court, the Bank Guarantee, the Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, Customs, this Court on 04.12.2008, Customs, Bank, Counsel, Customs, the Bank Guarantee, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Bank Guarantee, Courts, Bank Guarantees, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, the Central Board, the Commissioner (Appeals, the Central Board, Board, CESTAT, Board's Circular No, Section 35B, Appellate Tribunal, CESTAT, the Central Board, Patna, Usha Martin Industries Ltd., Bank Guarantee, CESTAT, Bank Guarantee, the Bombay High Court, Castrol India Limited v. Union of India, ELT, Ocean Driving Center Ltd., Union of India, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., Union of India, Union of India 2007, Union of India, Bank Guarantee, the Delhi High Court, Co. Pvt, the Rajasthan High Court, Shree Cement Ltd., Union of India .12, Bank Guarantee, Shinhan Bank Limited, Bank Guarantee, Customs, the Bank Guarantee, the Rajasthan High Courts, Bank Guarantee, the Central Board, P.M. Strips Ltd., Central Excise & Customs, AP, Court, Rajasthan High Courts, The Central Board's, Customs, Customs, Bank Guarantee, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Court, the Bank Guarantee, Court, the Bombay High Court, Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.'s, the Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantee, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, National Highways Authority of, the Supreme Court, Customs, the Central Board of Excise, Customs, Court, Bank Guarantee, the Supreme Court, HCL Info Systems Limited, Himadri Chemicals Industries Ltd., Coal Tar Refining Co., National Heavy Engg., Co. Ltd., Vinmar Impex Inc., Ors, State Trading Corporation of India Ltd., Jainsons Clothing Corporation, Bses Ltd., Reliance Energy Ltd., Fennar India Ltd., Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., SBI, AIR2000SC2548, Dwarikesh Sugar Industries Ltd., Prem Heavy Engineering Works, U.P. State Sugar Corporation, Sumac International Ltd., Maharashtra State Electricity Board, Svenskahandels Banken v., Bank Guarantee, the Central Board, Bank Guarantee, Bank Guarantees, Court, Bank, Bank Guarantee, the Central Board, Customs, the Judgment of a Division Bench, Court, Small Industries Development Bank of India, Hyderabad and Ors, Division Bench, the High Court, Customs, the Central Board, Revenue, Court, the Judgment of a Division Bench, Bombay High Court, Union of India, Dabhol Power Co., Court, Bank Guarantees, the Judgment of the Bombay High Court, Bank Guarantee, the Central Board, Customs, The Judgment of the Supreme Court, Dunlop India Ltd., The Supreme Court, Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Customs, The Judgment of the Supreme Court, CESTAT, CESTAT, Court, Customs, the Central Board, the Judgment of the Supreme Court, U.P. Public Service Commission, The Supreme Court, Court, Courts, Euclid, Bank Guarantee No, Bank Guarantee, Customs, Customs House, Kakinada

DATE: 1962, 1962, 1962, 01.11.2008, 04.11.2008, 02.06.1998, 02.06.1998, 1944, the period of, six months, the six month period, 2007, 2002, 24, 2008, a period of, six months, 22.09.2008, 26.09.2008, 1962, 1994, 5020868001, two weeks, one week, 31352, 31353, 32035, 32036, 32037, 2008

GPE: Visakhapatnam, Mumbai, Visakhapatnam, 20.10.2008, India, New Delhi, regard.10, India, New Delhi, Legrand, Delhi, New Delhi, Delhi, Mumbai, India, Bombay, Delhi, Bombay, Delhi, Legrand, India, New Delhi, India, India, Bombay, India, Canara Bank, New Delhi, India, India, India, West Bengal, India, India, Ashwani, India

CARDINAL: 3, 2, 20.10.2008, 4, 5020863001, 27.03.2002, 7.15, 20.10.2008, 22.09.2008, 26.09.2008, 20.10.2008, 31.10.2008, 03.11.2008, 7.15, 7.15, 1962.8, 25.05.2004, two, 1, one hundred and, 1997ECR257(SC, 208, 490, 2005(180)ELT313(Bom, 1992(59)ELT505(Bom, 216, 678, 2000(120)ELT57(Bom, 144, 223, 581, 25.05.2004, 4, 5, 6, 7.15, 2008)1SCC544, 1983]1SCR561, 1, 23, 2006(199)ELT782(Bom, 1985ECR4(SC, 2, 3, 7.15, 27.03.2002

PRODUCT: CESTAT?9, Judgment, Judgment

ORDINAL: first, first, 2007(5)ALD866

NORP: Vinitec, Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //