Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Midwest Integrated Steels Ltd. and anr. Vs. Registrar of Companies
Decided On : Feb-14-2007
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Section 220(3, the Companies Act, Section 374, Section 375 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 376, Section 376, Section 374, Section 397, Section 397, Chapter XXX, Section 397, Section 397, Section 203, Section 204, Section 399, Section 401, Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 397, Section 401, Section 401(3, Section 401(4, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 397, Section 397, Section 439(5, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 439
PERSON: Bilal Nazki, Counsel, Krishnaveni, Konajeti Rajababu v. State of A.P., Thupakula, Ramachandra Reddy v. State of A.P., Cakkula Sampath v. State of, Counsel, Vijay Pat v. State, Singh v. Ranbir Singh, Jagmohan Singh Kuldip, C. Kunnhamad v. C. Abdul Kader, Jagmohan Singh Kuldip, Ram Dass Ghosh v. State
NORP: J.1
DATE: 1956, 2001, July 8, 2002, one month, 1973, more than seven years, three months, appealed.14, 1986, 2002, 1972, 1978, 1898
GPE: C.C., Krishnan, Cri., Cri, Sections 395 - 401, Cr, P.C.
CARDINAL: 251, 5,000, 375, 200, 5,000, 1, 397, 4, 401, 398, 389, 390, 391, One, one, 1997CriLJ1519, 1985]153ITR818(AP, 2002(1)ALT403, 2, 227, 2001, 334, 373.16, 543, 1979CriLJ318, 2004CriLJ4254, 2004CriLJ4254, AIR1958Cal615, 616):I, 5
ORG: Hyderabad, A2, Section 374(2, Additional Sessions, Court, the High Court, a Court of Sessions or Metropolitan Magistrate, Learned Counsel, Court, revision.--(1, The High Court, Criminal Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Criminal Court, the High Court, the High Court, Judicial Magistrate, Magistrate, the Additional Sessions Judge.11, Court, Learned Counsel, Court, Thakasi Satyannmyana, Court, LJ, State, Maharashtra, LJ, State, Maharashtra, the High Court, The Calcutta High Court
ORDINAL: second