K. Raghuram Babu Vs. Director General of Railway Protection Force, New Delhi and ors.

Decided On : Sep-07-2001

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 21, a Division Bench, Section 34, Section 34, the Industrial Disputes Act, Section 10 of the Act, Section 10(3)(a, Section 10(3)(a, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, the Amendment Act, Article 14 of the Constitution

ORG: S.B. Sinha, the Railway Protection Force Rules, the Railway Protection Force, Parliament, the Railway Protection Force Act, the Central Government, the Public Servants Inquiries Act, Force, Force, the Force of or, Sub-Inspector, Court, Railway Protection Force Rules, Rajasthan High Court, Division Bench, Court, the Rajasthan High Court, Reliance, Counsel, the Railway Protection Force, Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, Phrases, Permanent Edition, Volume IA, Black's Law Dictionary, Act, Legislature, Reserve Bank, Peerless Company, the Calcutta High Court, the Selection Committee, Court, Statutory Interpretation, AC 1, Court, Kammins Ballrooms Company Limited, Zenith Investments, Torquay) Limited, AC 850, Parliamenl, Parliament, Court, Parliament, 5th Edition, The Supreme Court, LJ, BEG, Seaford Court Estates Limited, Magor and St., RDC, Newsport Corporation, LJ, Court, Legislature, Court, Magor, St. Mellon's, L.J. However, Court, Hamedia Hardware Stores, B.P. Corporation Limited, Maharashtra General Kamgar Union, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Corporation, Model Standing Orders, the Trade Union, the Certified Standing Orders, the Standing Orders, the Model Standing Orders, The Standing Orders, the Appellate Authority, the Draft Standing Orders, M/s. Cipla Limited, Ripu Daman Bhanot, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Court, Zilla Praja Parishad, Sections, State, Slate of Tamil Nadu

CARDINAL: 153(8, 2., 3., 153, 1, 8), 10, 11, 1, 161, 8), 10, 11, 4., 16-10-1997, 153-8, 143, 10-4-1995, 5., 16, 6-12-1999, 6, 153(8, 8, 9, 10, 11, 153(8, 12, 1998CriLJ1905, 336, 338, one, two, 343, one, two, 13, 1, 2, 14, 1987]2SCR1, One, 15, 4, 661, 16, 17, 18, 105, one, three, 19, 1978)ILLJ349SC, 2, 839, 20, 1988]3SCR384, 3, one, two, two, 21, 4, 29, 4, 4, 29.4, 22, 1999)ILLJ900SC, one, 16, 23, 26, 57, 24, 1978]2SCR621, 1983]1SCR1000, 25, 153(8, 153(8, 26, 27

DATE: 1987, 18-9-1995, 1957, 1850, 1996, 1987, 1980, 1998, 1998(4)ALD197 ., 1712, 1999, 1971, 1980, 1971, 1992, 1947, 1951, 1999)ILLJ352SC, 1991, 1974)ILLJ172SC

PRODUCT: Rs.10,000/-, Para 14

GPE: WP, India, Counsel, MR, Anantha, D.F.P., Jones, Denning, L.J., Denning, Denning, Devender v. State of A.P

PERSON: Articles 14, Sri S.R. Sanku, Jaya Sen v., K.R. Sarkar, AIR1998Cal288, T. Subba Rao v., Bhimavaram, Sri R.S. Murthy, Sanku, Murthy, Reed Dickerson, Kumar Bej v. State, Ina, Francis Bennion, Francis Bennion Statutory Interpretation, Bill, G.P. Singh, A. Rqjappa, K. Iyer, J., B. Mohan Lal Sowear, Articles 14, E.P. Royappa v., Maneka Gandhi, Sanjeev Coke ManufacturingCompany v. M/s. Bharat, Murthy

EVENT: the Railway Establishment Code, The British Constitution

WORK_OF_ART: Sixth Edition, 'The Interpretation and Application of Statutes', 1975 Edition, Bangalore Water Supply v., Law Lords

ORDINAL: first, First, secondly, thirdly, third

TIME: the entire Act

FAC: Wrotham Park Settled Estates

LANGUAGE: English