East India Udyog Ltd. Vs. Cce

Decided On : Oct-31-2006

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 35F, Section 11-A of the Central Excise Act, Rule 173Q, Section 11-AC, Section 11-AB, the Tariff Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 4(3)(d, Section 35F, Section 22, Section 4, Rule 5, Section 4(1, Rule 4, Section 4(3)(d, Section 4 of the Act, Rule 173Q, Section 11AC, Section 22

CARDINAL: 1, 35,98,220/-, 11,96,563/-, 35,98,220/-, 11,96,563/-, 11,96,563/-, 01.07.2000, 160, 314, 5, 1.7.2000, 10.4.2000, 10.4.2001, 01.07.2000, 3, 35,98,220/-, 11,96,563/-, 11,96,563/-, 1.7.2000, about two third, 30, three, 5, five, 05.01.2007

DATE: 1944, 11.8.2006, 18.2.2003, 1944, 1944, 1944, 2000, 11^st July 2000, July 2000, November 2001, many years, 2003, 1985, 2005, 70, 10^th July 2001 to November 2001, one year, 1985, 1944, 1985, 2000, July 2000, November 2001, excise duty.10, 1985, eight weeks, today

ORG: Hon'ble High Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, I.T.C. Limited v. Commissioner (Appeals, Customs, the Commissioner (Appeals, labour &amp, Central Excise Valuation, State, Joint, The Appellate Commissioner, it.5, Reliance, the Tribunal in Filament India, CCE, ELT, the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, the Tribunal in PSL Ltd., CCE, RLT 389, the Apex Court, Baroda Electric Metric, CCE, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Metal Box India Limited v., Central Excise, Mumbai Section, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Metal Box India Limited, the Tribunal in Filament India, The Commissioner (Appeals

NORP: Central Excise, Central Excise, Daman

PERSON: Ors.2, 7,67,165/-, outward handling, Anr

GPE: Act.3, Jaipur, Act.7, Counsel, Clause, Clause

PERCENT: roughly about 66%, about 66%

PRODUCT: BIFR.However, Rule 6.9