The Agricultural Market Committee Vs. Sri Sankar Rao and Company and anr.

Decided On : Feb-18-2003

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Negotiable Instruments Act, the NI Act', Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the NI Act, the Limitation Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the NI Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, the NI Act, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 138(b, the NI Act, Section 138, the NI Act, Section 142, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 138, Section 142 and Clause, Section 138, Section 5, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 34, the Arbitration Act', Section 34, Section 5, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, the Limitation Act, Section 34 of the 1996 Act, Section 34, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 34 of the 1996 Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 142, the NI Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Chapter XVII, the NI Act, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 5, Section 5, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 138, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 29, Section 138, Section 29(2, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 5, the Limitation Act, Section 473, Section 142, the NI Act

PERSON: L. Narasimha Reddy, Kurnool District, Badana Bhaskara Rao, Mohapatra v. Saroj Kumar, L.J. 1751, Kumar Goenka, Mohan, Shri Vishnu Spinners, Sri Bhagyalakshmi, L. J. 1221, Lalit Narain Mishra, Order XXI, Janardhan Mohapatra v. Saroj, SRK Mohan, Lalitnarain Mishra, Sri Vishnu Spinners'

NORP: J.1, Satish, Satish

ORG: Revisions, Agricultural Market Committee, Banker, the Court of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, The Trial Court, the Orissa High Court, BC 113=1993 Crl, Court, Counsel, Court, BC, Public Prosecutor, inter alia, Court, Court, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, Courts, Court, Sections, High Courts, Sections 4 - 24, Sections, Municipal Corporation, clear.10, Sections 4 - 24, Supreme Court, Union of India v. Popular Construction Company, Sections 4 - 24, Court, the Supreme Court, LimitationAct, Court, Sections 4 - 24, Parliament, Court, Sections 4 - 24, Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Court, Sections 138 - 142, the applicability of Section 5, Court, Judges of, the Orissa High Court, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Union of India v. Popular Construction Company, Court

ORDINAL: 1st, first, Firstly, Secondly

DATE: 1881, 1963, 1994, 1999, 1 month to 3 months, 1973, one month, one month, 15 days, 15 days, 45 days, 45 days, 1908, 1963, 1908, 1963, 1963, 1976, 1996, 1976(1, one month, 1973, one month, 1963, 2 days, several years

CARDINAL: two, 2000(4, 253, 2, 4, 4, 1, 393, One, one, 8, 393, 12, 3, 14, 1974]3SCR31, 12, 14, 2, two, 1974]3SCR31

GPE: Janardhan, Manguram, Delhi, Manguram, Hukum, Cr, P.C.

PRODUCT: Section 138, Section 138

WORK_OF_ART: the Scheme of the Act

FAC: Hukum Narain Yadav