Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hyder MohiuddIn Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Decided On : Dec-09-1997

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: the Constitution of India, Section 6 of Life Insurance Corporation Act, Section 6, Chapter III, Section 6, Modem Insurance Law', Constitution, Article 38(2, Constitution, Article 39(c, the Insurance Act, Section 21, Section 26, Section 27, Section 28, Section 29, the Insurance Act, Section 2(1, Section 13, Section 14, Section 34, Section 34E, Article 142 of the Constitution on 7th May, 1987, Article 144 of Constitution of India

CARDINAL: 1, 1987]2SCR1, 1/3rd, 30-6-1988, 1, 46.94, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5., 1/10th, 17x1, 1,000, 226.401,000, 1076.40, 50.8, 50.8, 546.81 100, 9, 18 to 19, 2,86,817, 245,82,20,914, more than 245, about three, 43, 2(11, 2B, 1, 2, 3, three, 1, one, only 2,86,817, 1995)1SCC259, 14, two, 142, 144, 14, one, 142, 144

ORG: the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India.2, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Life Insurance, Corporation, Corporation, the Life Insurance, Corporation, Corporation, Endowment or Life, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Supreme Court, Reserve Bank, India- v. Peerless Company, Corporation, Court, the Government of India, Corporation, Court, the Life Insurance Corporation Act, the Government of India and Union of India, Court, Corporation, Corporation, Parliament, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Endowment Assurances, Surrender, Value', the Cash Value of the, Surrender value, Surrender, Rs.850.00, Rs.2,500/-, the Central Government, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, the Supreme Court, Reserve Bank, Peerless Company, the Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Peerless Company, the Life Insurance Corporation, Court, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, State, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Peerless Company, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Peerless, the Life Insurance Corporation, Counsel for Peerless, State, Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Life Insurance Corporation Act, Corporation, the Central Government, Corporation, Corporation, the Central Government, Corporation, the Central Government, Life Insurance, Corporation, Corporation, the Central Government, Corporation, the Central Government, the Central Government, Parliament, the Central Government, Sections 64S, 64UA of the Insurance Act, Corporation, Government, the Government of India, Court, Corporation, Corporation, Parliament, the Central Government, Parliament, Court, the Surrender Value, Corporation, Tata Cellular v. Union of India, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Courpt, The Supreme Court, Corporation, Surrender, the Surrender 'Value, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Surrender, Corporation, Surrender of policies, Rs.245,82,20,914/-, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Corporation, Court, Corporation, the Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation, Corporation, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Corporation, Corporation, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation, CMP, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Corporation, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Apex Court, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, The Supreme Court, the Apex Court, Court, the Apex Court, Spencer, Co., Vishwadarshan Distributors, the Supreme Court, Madras High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the OSA Nos.69-73, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Special Leave Appeal (Civil, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Life Insurance Corporation of India, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Union of India

NORP: Policy, Policy

DATE: the first three years, five years, between three years, five years, five years, the year, 20 years, 10 years, 1987, two full years, 20 years, 11 to 19 years, 5 to 10 years, more than one year's, 1st April, 1973, three full years', 14-20 years, half-yearly, 10th August, 1962, 10th August, 1970, years, 81/2 years, Number of years, 2000, 1956, year 1987, the year ending 31st March, 1987, one year, '10, 39, 41, daily, bonus year, '10, the years, detail.11, 1956, two years, each financial year, the previous financial year, 1938, every year, 1986, more than two years, two years, first two years, the first two years, two years, the year 1986.12, the year 1987, 11th September, 1987, 14th January, 1994, three months, 1993, three months, 12597-600/93, 14th January, 1994

LOC: Policy, Policy

PERCENT: 90%, only 90%, about 42%, 42%, 90%, 50%, 10.5%, more than 6%, 95%, 35%

PERSON: Surrender Valuel , Surrender, Surrender, para-XI, Rs.850.00, Surrender, John Birds, Articles 38, Surrender, Articles 141, Arjuna, Articles 141, proceedings.14

GPE: Assurance, India, Loan, India

PRODUCT: Rs.2,000/-, Memorandum

FAC: Bonus, Bonus, Bhagavad Gita

QUANTITY: 113.20x2,000-------------

ORDINAL: third, first

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //