Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Cce Vs. Ankit Consultancy Ltd. and Shri
Decided On : Oct-10-2006
Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
LAW: Section 65(19, Section 65, the Finance Act, ITR SC 234
CARDINAL: 1, two, two, 6, 15.12.2004, 1, 14(3, transferee, 4, 1.5.2006, 65(89, 95, 105, 3, 8.1, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5., 8.6., 8.7, five, 8.8.3, 8.8.5, 8.9, 8.10, 8.11, 8.12, 8.13, 8.14
ORG: Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Department, STA, Registrar, the General Obligations, Counsel, the Commissioner (Appeals, Counsel, the Hon'ble SC, Counsel, Toubro Ltd., CCE, Chennai 2006, Central Depository Services, Ankit Consultancy Private Ltd., Dematerialization, CDS, the Dematerialisation Request Form, DRF, CDS, Issuer, CDS, CDS, CDS, CDS, Central of State Government, CDS, DRF, DRF, CDS, CDS, CDS, Issuer, Issuer, the Bye Laws and Operating Instructions, CDA, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Union of India, State, the Commissioner (Appeals
DATE: 7th April, 2005, 1993, 1993, the current year w.e.f., the current year, 2006, 1010, 1.7.2003, daily, a period of, 15 days
EVENT: Regulation 14(2, Clause 8.3
NORP: Registrat, Issuer, Issuer, Issuer, Issuer
PERSON: Share Transfer, Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust, Bench, Bhaktawar Singh Balkishan
GPE: Counsel, Larsen
PRODUCT: Para 8
ORDINAL: firstly, secondly