Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Cce Vs. Ankit Consultancy Ltd. and Shri

Decided On : Oct-10-2006

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

LAW: Section 65(19, Section 65, the Finance Act, ITR SC 234

CARDINAL: 1, two, two, 6, 15.12.2004, 1, 14(3, transferee, 4, 1.5.2006, 65(89, 95, 105, 3, 8.1, 8.3, 8.4, 8.5., 8.6., 8.7, five, 8.8.3, 8.8.5, 8.9, 8.10, 8.11, 8.12, 8.13, 8.14

ORG: Commissioner (Appeals, the Commissioner (Appeals, Department, STA, Registrar, the General Obligations, Counsel, the Commissioner (Appeals, Counsel, the Hon'ble SC, Counsel, Toubro Ltd., CCE, Chennai 2006, Central Depository Services, Ankit Consultancy Private Ltd., Dematerialization, CDS, the Dematerialisation Request Form, DRF, CDS, Issuer, CDS, CDS, CDS, CDS, Central of State Government, CDS, DRF, DRF, CDS, CDS, CDS, Issuer, Issuer, the Bye Laws and Operating Instructions, CDA, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Union of India, State, the Commissioner (Appeals

DATE: 7th April, 2005, 1993, 1993, the current year w.e.f., the current year, 2006, 1010, 1.7.2003, daily, a period of, 15 days

EVENT: Regulation 14(2, Clause 8.3

NORP: Registrat, Issuer, Issuer, Issuer, Issuer

PERSON: Share Transfer, Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust, Bench, Bhaktawar Singh Balkishan

GPE: Counsel, Larsen

PRODUCT: Para 8

ORDINAL: firstly, secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //