Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Gandla Pannala Bhulaxmi Vs. Managing Director, Apsrtc and anr.
Decided On : Jun-10-2003
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: the Letters Patent Act, Section 100-A, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 173 of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 100-A of the Principal Act, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, Section 100A, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 100A, Section 100A of the Code, Section 100A of the Code, Section 100A of the Code, Section 100A of the Code, Section 6(3, Section 100A of the Code, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Section 100A of the Code, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 100A of the Code
CARDINAL: 1, 2, 88, 14-6-2002, 88, 1, 1, 1, 6, 1, 15, 11, 2002]2SCR404
ORG: Court, LPA, Court, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge, Court, LPA, Court, S. Shiva Raja Reddy, Parliament, Letters Patent, a High Court, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, a High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Emphasis, Letters Patent, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the Letters Patent ', the High Court, the High Court, the District Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, a High Court, the High Court, Emphasis
GPE: C.P.C., C.M.A., Judge.12, Bihar
DATE: 1998, 1988, 1998, 1908, 2002, 1999, 46 of 1999, 1894, '13, 1894
PERSON: Nizamabad, maintainable?4, S. Raghu Raj Reddy, Vinita M. Khanolkar v., Pragna M. Pai, Sharda Devi v. State of
ORDINAL: 2002(5)ALD181
LOC: cases.- Notwithstanding, Single
FAC: Shiva Raja Reddy