Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gandla Pannala Bhulaxmi Vs. Managing Director, Apsrtc and anr.

Decided On : Jun-10-2003

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Letters Patent Act, Section 100-A, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 173 of the Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 100-A of the Principal Act, Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, Section 100A, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 100A, Section 100A of the Code, Section 100A of the Code, Section 100A of the Code, Section 100A of the Code, Section 6(3, Section 100A of the Code, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Section 54, Section 100A of the Code, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 100A of the Code

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 88, 14-6-2002, 88, 1, 1, 1, 6, 1, 15, 11, 2002]2SCR404

ORG: Court, LPA, Court, the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (District Judge, Court, LPA, Court, S. Shiva Raja Reddy, Parliament, Letters Patent, a High Court, Letters Patent, Letters Patent, a High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Emphasis, Letters Patent, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the Letters Patent ', the High Court, the High Court, the District Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, the High Court, a High Court, the High Court, Emphasis

GPE: C.P.C., C.M.A., Judge.12, Bihar

DATE: 1998, 1988, 1998, 1908, 2002, 1999, 46 of 1999, 1894, '13, 1894

PERSON: Nizamabad, maintainable?4, S. Raghu Raj Reddy, Vinita M. Khanolkar v., Pragna M. Pai, Sharda Devi v. State of

ORDINAL: 2002(5)ALD181

LOC: cases.- Notwithstanding, Single

FAC: Shiva Raja Reddy

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //