Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ramappa (M.) Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Decided On : Dec-13-1960

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 3 of the Act, Section 9, Section 3, Section 122, the States Reorganization Act, Central Act XXXVII, Section 122, the States Reorganization Act, Section 3(2, Section 119 of the States Reorganization Act, Section 120, Section 3(2).12, Section 3(2, Section 3, Section 127, Section 3 of the Act, Section 122, the States Reorganization Act, Section 3, Section 115, Section 115, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311(2, Rule 4, Rule 4, Section 3(2, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Article 311, Article, Article 311, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311, Article 226 of the Constitution, Article 311, Article 226

PERSON: Chandra Reddi, Sri Bhaskara Rao, Sri M. Sriramamurthi, Sri Sriramamurthi, Sri Sriramamurthi, Rajagopala Ayyangar, Rajagopala Ayyar v. Madras State, Subba Rao, Rajagopala Ayyar v., Madras State, S.C.J. 461, Mukherjee, J., Mohammed Ghouse v. State, W.P. Nos

ORG: the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Hyderabad Revenue Service, District Collector, the Public Works Department, the X Branch, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings under Section 4, the Hyderabad Public Servants, Tribunal, the Disciplinary Proceedings Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, the State of Andhra Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, SCHEDULEFunctions, DisciplinaryXXII, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, the Hyderabad Public Servants, the Andhra Pradesh, the State Government, The Central Government, the State Government, State, State, Central, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, the Madras Civil Services, the Disciplinary Tribunal, Government, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, Government, the Disciplinary Tribunal, Court, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, the Madras State, the Andhra State Act, Government, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, the Madras Civil Services, the Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings, the Railway Rates Tribunal, Das, Union of India 1959 I.L.L. 167, Government, Government, Court, the Public Servants (Inquiry) Act, Government, Government, Court, Court, Court

DATE: 1940, 1948, 1956, 1950, 1950, April 1959, 1950, 19 August 1959, 22 September 1959, 1950, less than three years, less than three years, 1 November 1956, the day, 1956, 1956, 1950, 1950, that day, less than three years, 1956, 1948, 1953, 1948, 1954, 1850, 1978

GPE: OLD, India, India, Telangana, Andhra, Telangana, Bhimasankaram, O.J., Khem Chand v., Venkataraman v. Union of India

CARDINAL: As many as nineteen, four, one, 2, 2, 1, less than three, two, 1, 2, one, 462, 175, one, three, 150.29, 350, 417

PRODUCT: Rule 16 of the Hyderabad Public Servants

ORDINAL: secondly

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //