Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Subba Rao (N.) Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Decided On : Jan-11-1960

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 465(2, Article 465A, Article 311 of the Constitution of India, Rule 55, Rule 55, Article 465A, Article 465A, Rule 17, Article 309 of the Constitution, Rule 8, Article 311(2, Constitution, Central Act XXXVII, Rule 17(b)(i, Rule 17(b)(i, Rule 17(b)(i, Article 311(2, Constitution, Rule 55, Article 311(2, Rule 55, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 311(2, Constitution, Article 331(2, Article 311 of the Constitution, Article 311, Article 311(2, Rule 55, Section 240(3, Article 311(2, Article 311(2, Constitution, Pun 58, Rule 55, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution.33

PERSON: ORDERAnantanarayana Ayyar, N. Subba Rao, Andhra State, Mandapet, Sri N. Subba Rao, Alamur, Pleader, Shyam Lal v. State of, Enquiry, Sri N. Subba Rao, Explanation.-An, Pleader, Kapur Singh v. Union, Pun, Kapur Singh v. Union, Shyam Lal v. State, Kapur Singh v. Union, Pun, Jaga Rao v. State of, Namyana Rao v. State, Kapur Singh v. Union, Narayana Rao v. State, I.M. Lal, Ganjanan Mahadev, Joseph John, Kapur Singh v. Union, Kapur Singh v. State, Narayana Rao v. State, Kapur Singh v. Union, Sri Mahipal Singh, I.M. Lal, I.M. Lal

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 21, one, 2, 2, 2, two, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, One, 1, 139, 146, 8, 55, two, thereof.(ii, 17(b)(i, 3, 462, 137, 17(b)(i, 58, 60, two, 55, 1695, 55, 139, 55, 1695, 979, two, 982):1, two, 979, 187, 294, two, 979, 187, 294, 915, 238, 238-239, 2, one, three, 462, 979, 187, 294, 462.27, 171, two, 462, 462, more than one, 2, 21, 100

DATE: May 1955, 12 March 1956, 7053, 21 October 1955, 20 and 22 May 1954, 20 May 1954, 22 May 1954, 20 May 1954, 21 May 1954, 20, May 1954, May 1954, 6 October 1954, 20 November 1954, seven days, 7 May 1955, 21 May 1955, 21 May 1955, fifteen days, 21 May 1955, 6 June 1955, 18 June 1955, 21 October 1955, two months, effect:-On 24 January 1955, 16 April 1965, 20 April 1955, 7 May 1955, 12 March 1958, Rule 5, namely:(vi, January 1950, 21 May 1955, 18 June 1955, 21 October 1955, under date 18 June 1955, 1850, 1850, one month, 11 July 1957, 13 December 1957, 1956, 1950, 1956, 58, 1950, Rule 17, 1956, 58, 1956, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1956, 58, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1954, two months', 1935, 1956, 58, 1956, 1956, 1957, 1958, 1959, 1956, 58, A.I.R. 1945 F.C. 47, 1948, two months, 21 May 1955, 21 May 1955, October 1955

ORG: Court, Hon'ble Court, Excise and Prohibition, the Sub-Magistrate's, Court, Court, Court, the Court of Stationary Sub-Magistrate, Court, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal) Rules, the District Prohibition Officer, following1, Government, Excise, Board of Revenue, us.9, the Board of Revenue, the Board of Revenue, the Civil Service Regulations, Uttar Pradesh, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Civil Service Regulations, the Civil Service, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal), the Central Government, the Madras Civil Services, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal Rules, Stationary Sub-Magistrate, the Madras Civil Services, the Public Servants, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, the Civil Services Rules, the Civil Services Rules, the Civil Services Rules, Government, Government, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Union of India 1959, the Supreme Court, the Central Civil Services, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Bombay High Court, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, the Punjab High Court, Government, I.L.R., the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal, Uttar Pradesh, the Civil Services (, the Public Servants, Court, Court, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, BO, State, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Andhra High Court, Court, State of, Andhra and Andhra Pradesh, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, Pan, State of Andhra v. T. Ramayya, State, State, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court, Union of India 1959, Government, Government, Government, the Civil Services, Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Government of India Act, Government, Views, the Bombay High Court, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, Justice, the Madras Civil Services, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Punjab High Court, the Andhra and Andhra Pradesh High Courts, State of Andhra v. T. Ramayya, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, Union of India 1959, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, Dadarao Tidke, Stale of Madhya Pradesh, the Federal Court, State, the Supreme Court, the Federal Court, the Bombay High Court, Dadarao Tidke v. Slate of Madhya Pradesh, the Privy Council, State, P.C. 121, Union of India 1959, the Supreme Court, the Privy Council, the Federal Court, Government, Dadarao Tidke, Madhya Pradesh, the Supreme Court's, the District Prohibition Officer, Court

GPE: Prohibition, Guntur, R.C., East Godavari, Clause, Clause, Khem Chand v., decision.19, I.L.R., Jogarao, K.V., Jogaraov, K.V., pp, Khem Chand v., India, Joga Rao v. State, K.V., Khem Chand v., Khem Chand v., A.I.R., Khem Chand v., completed.30

PRODUCT: Mandapet, Rule 8, I L.L.J. 167

WORK_OF_ART: the Bord of Revenue, State of Travancore-Cochin 1956 I L.L.J. 235

QUANTITY: 1954 II L.L.J., 1954 II L.L.J.

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, second, first, first, second, second, second, first, first, second, first, first, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, first, first, second, second, second, first, second, first, second, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, second, second, second, first, second, second, first, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, first, second, second, first, first, second, second, second, first, first, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //