Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hyderabad Race Club Vs. Esi Corporation

Decided On : Sep-04-1996

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 1(5, the Madras Police Act, Madras Gaming Act, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, Section 75, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 137, Chapter 26, Article 137, Section 45B, Section 40, Section 43, Section 44, Section 1(5, Section 45B, Section 75, Section 40, Section 40 of the Act, Section 14B

PERSON: Lingaraja Rath, K. Srinivasa Murthy, Counsel, Schedule, Srinivasa Murthy, R.K. Swamy, Jea Band, Regional Dir, E.S.I. Corpn., Jaipur, Sinivasa Murthy, R.K. Lakshmanan, Srinivasa Murthy, Madras, Cotton Mills, E.S.I. Corpn., T.P. Kunhaliumma AIR, Article137, Srinivasa Murthy, Ltd.(supra

ORG: Court, the Employees' Insurance Court at Hyderabad, The E.I. Court, the E.I. Court, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, The E.I. Court, the Hyderabad Race Club, A.P. Shops & Establishments Act, the State Government, the Apex Court, Cochin Shipping Co., E.S.I. Corporation, SC, Employees' State Insurance Corpn, SC, Court, International Ore & Fertilizers, E.S.I Corpn.(1988-I-LLJ-235, SC, Court, Cochin Shipping, the Cochin shipping Co., Court, Court, R.K.Swamy, Court, M/s, SC, A.P. Shops & Establishments Act inter alia, Statute, E.I. Court, the Supreme Courtheld, Madras Race Club, Court, Supreme, the E.I. Court, Reliance, Gemini Studios, E.S.I. Corporation, Court, E.S.I. Corporation, the Insurance Court, Standing Counsel, Court, Labour Indtl, the E.I. Court, Kerala S.E. Board, the Supreme Court, Court, Sections 4, Court, Court, Court, E.I. Court, a Civil Court, the Civil Court, Civil Court, E.I. Court, the E.I. Court, Corporation, theEmployees State Insurance (, Corporation, Corporation, Court, W.P. No, SN, Corporation, Corporation, the E.I. Court, Court, the E.I. Court, Court, Corporation, Hotel Kalpaka International, SC, Court, Notice, The Supreme Court, Employees, R.P.F., SC, oneRegional Provident Fund, Inspectorvisiting, Corporation, the Supreme Court, Corporation, Nocosts

CARDINAL: 6701, 32,06, 3, 297, 297, 1, 3(iii, two, 226, 5, 5230, 1979(1, one, 4, 883, 189

DATE: January 29, 1992, 1777-, March 30, 1975 to, December 31, 1991, 1948, March 26, 1975, 1988, 1993, 1994, 1987, March 30, 1975 to, December 31, 1991, more than three years old, 1963, three years, 1970-II, three years, three years, 1975, 1037, 1977, 1963, three years, later than15 days, Form 10, 1978, March 17, 1979, 1993, March 26, 1975, January 29, 1992, the year 1975.11, 1952, 1995, 12 years, inthe year 1985, 22, June 27, 1990, March 26, 1975, the year 1987, the year 1975 to 1986, the year 1975, the year 1987, the year 1987

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first

NORP: Hindu, Actvests, Statute, Maharashtra, Hindu

GPE: Adoni, rejected.10, beforetheir

EVENT: SC 282, Limitation Act, Limitation Act

PRODUCT: Regional

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //