National Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Rajesh Helmandge and Another

Decided On : Mar-20-2001

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the WC Act, Section 4-A(3, the WC Act, the WC Act, Section 30, the WC Act, Section 30, the WC Act, the Motor Vehicles Act, the M.V. Act', the W.C. Act', Section 149, Section 149(2, the MV Act, Section 96(2, the MV Act, Section 149(2, the MV Act, Section 96(2, the MV Act, the WC Act, Section 30, the WC Act, Section 149(2, the MV Act, the WC Act, the Amendment Act 22 of, the Case Law, Section 149, Section 30, Section 149(2, the MV Act, the WC Act, Section 149 of the MV Act, the WC Act, Section 149 of the MV Act, the WC Act, Section 96, the MV Act, the Indian Evidence Act, the WC Act, Section 4 of the Act, Amendment Act 22, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, the Amendment Act 22 of 1984, the WC Act, the WC Act, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, the WC Act, Section 4, the WC Act, the Amendment Act 22 of 1984, Section 30, the WC Act, Section 30, the WC Act, Section 149(2, the MV Act, Section 149(2, the MV Act, the WC Act, Section 167, Chapter X, Section 167, the MV Act, Section 166, the WC Act, the WC Act, Section 167, the MV Act, the WC Act, the Evidence Act, The WC Act, Section 30, the MV Act, Section 173, the WC Act, Section 4, Section 4(1)(a)(b)(c)(i, Section 19, the WC Act, Section 19 of the WC Act, Section 19(1, Section 19(2, Section 19(1, Section 4(1)(a)(b)(c)(i, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, the WC Act, the WC Act, the WC Act, the WC Act, the MV Act and WC Act, Section 149(2, the MV Act, the WC Act, Section 2(1)(g, Section 4(1)(c)(ii, Section 19(1, Section 21, the Evidence Act, The WC Act

ORG: ORDER1, the National Insurance Company Limited/, the Insurance Company', WC No.75, ADT, the Insurance Company, the Tribunal in WC No.75, the Workmen's Compensation Act, The Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, Tribunal, Calcutta Chemicals, AIR 1969, Municipal Board, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Medical Certificate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, theState, the Insurance Company, the Supreme Court, New India Assurance Company Limited, Tribunal, Counsel, Court, New India Assurance Company Limited v. Sammayya, the Insurance Company, Reliance, APSRTC, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the Insurance Company, Counsel, New India Assurance Company Limited, FLR 97, National Insurance Company Limited, ACC 388, the Insurance Company, Sammayya, the Insurance Company, The Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Medical Certificate, Ex, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, Sammayya, Court, Karnataka High Court, Court, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the Claims Tribunal, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Oriental Insurance Company Limited, FLR 341, Sections 95, Medical Certificate, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Medical Certificate, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, the Supreme Court, Sitaram, Learned Counsel, the Supreme Court, Sammayya, Court, Workmen's Compensation, Court, National Insurance Company Limited, Schedule-IV, the Insurance Company, New India Assurance Company Limited v., Legislature, Expert, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Expert, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, Tribunal, the Workmen's Compensation Act, MV Act, Sum of, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, the Commissioner (Tribunal, Schedule-I., The Commissioner/Tribunal, Expert, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Medical Board, Tribunal, the State of Maharashtra, the Insurance Company, the Division Bench, Court, Tribunal, the Insurance Company, Court, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, the Insurance Company, New India Assurance v., the Supreme Court, the Insurance Company, CMA, theInsurance Company

CARDINAL: 31, 1, 2., 25, 1,200/-, 3., 1., 2, 1, 3, 4, 4, 379, 25, 31, 21, 5, 5, 137, 1995(3)ALD809, 65, 1, 6, 1., 2, 1, 8, more than one, 9, only two, 10, two, 11, 2, 12, 104, 65, 97, 2, 2, 13, 83, 115, 2, 14, 1,000/-, 15, 1966]3SCR527, 16, 16, 1972]2SCR646, one, 110, 17, 1995(3)ALD809, 1992)IILLJ377AP, 18, 4(1)(c)(ii, 1, 19, 20, two, two, 22, 2, 23, 2, 24, two, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30

DATE: 1990, 1209, 1209, 24 years, monthly, 1990, 1923, 7461, 1982, monthly, 24 years, monthly, 2000, 1995)IILLJ318AP, 1988, 1992, 1988, 1988, 1939, 1988, 1984, 2000, 1992, 1999, 1973, 1939, 1939, 1703, 87, 1984, 1995, 1984, 1984, paragraph-12, 1923, 8 of 1923, 1923, Rs.25,000/-, 21, Rs.25,000/-, '19, about 10 years, 1923

ORDINAL: first, second, second, firstly, 96of, first, first, third, second, second, third, second, second, third, 1998(1)ALD720

WORK_OF_ART: theTribunal', Nyaya Mailiasab Ghouse Sab Muke

GPE: Maharashtra State, WP, Rs.1,000/-, Rs.1,000/-, Workmen, Purshothama v. Perumal, Counsel, Workmen, Counsel, Integra

PERSON: lorry, lorry, V.K. Burman, Harilal, lorry, Shiv Singh, Abdul Sattar, Raja Naika, Law, Law, Chinnamma George v. N.K. Raju, Raja Naika's, Gowramma, Kamala Devi v. Navin Kumar, Santanuprasad, Ramamurthi, Bhagat Ram v., Khetu Ram, Mohammed Saleem Khan, S.R. Nayak, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Waheed Khan, Shiv Singh

MONEY: 50 per cent, six per cent, 50 per cent, six per cent, 100 per cent, 50 per cent, six per cent

PRODUCT: No.1, 777, 373, 767

FAC: Nyaya Mathasab's, Raja Naika's

PERCENT: 50%, 50%, 100%, 100%, 50%, as 50%, 100%, 100%, 50%, 25%, 100%

NORP: contra

LOC: Sammaya

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act