Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M. Seetharamaswami and Co. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer, Elluru

Decided On : Dec-08-1959

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 2, Section 15, Section 30, Rule 17, Section 30, Section 32, Section 16, Section 30, Section 16(3, Section 30, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 16(3, Section 30(1, Article 20(2, Constitution, Section 16 of the Act, Section 14, Section 30, Section 28, Section 16, the Hyderabad Akbari Act, Section 10, Section 30, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Section 30, Section 30(3, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 30, Section 15, Section 14, Section 8-A, Section 30, Article 20(2, Constitution, Article 20(2, Constitution, Article 20(2, Article 20 of the Constitution, Article 20(2).Similarly, Section 161 Clause 8 of the Sea Customs Act 1878, Article 20(2, Constitution, the Sea Customs Act, Article 20(2, Section 167, Section 16, Section 30, Section 80, Article 20(2, Constitution

ORG: ORDERSeshachalapathi, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, treasury, the Government Treasury, treasury, treasury, Court, The Board of Revenue, Department, Department, State, the Supreme Court of India, State, AIR 1951 SC 318, State, follows:'It, Court, Section 30(1, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales-tax Act, Magistrate Khali, Clauses, the Supreme Court, the Public Servants (Inquiries, Sections 161, Leo Roy Frey v. Superintendent, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Sea Customs Authorities, the Sea Customs Act

NORP: J.1, follows:'You, Actis

DATE: 1957-58, 1957, monthly, the month of October 1957, 7-8-1958, 3 days, less than fifteen days, each month, the first three months, each month, the first three months, under Section 29, six months, six months, 1959-2, '11, 1951, 1957, six months, six months, Six months, punishment.14, 1850

CARDINAL: 8-8, 17, 2, 7, 40,323, 3-8-1958, 1,209-75, 2, 1, 200, 3, three, 1, 30, 3, one, two, 18, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2., two, 3., 4., 5, 4, two thousand, 2., two thousand, 3., two thousand, two thousand, 7, two, 5, 432, 9, 6, 31, 33, 31, 33, two, two, two, two, two, one, 1950]1SCR869, 478, 1952CriLJ510, two, 1, 3, 1, 3, one thousand, 13, 1,000/-, 1, 30, 3, one, 1954CriLJ993, 2, 1983ECR1598D(SC, 1958CriLJ260, 1959CriLJ392, 8), 3, 1, 3

PERSON: Sri Sitaramanjeneya, Rice Mill, Peddireddi Sesha, Krishna Rao J., Charanjit Lal Choudhury v. Union, F.N. Balsara, Anwar Ali, J., Levy, I. P. C., Thomas Dana v. State of Punjab

WORK_OF_ART: The Writ of Prohibition, a Writ of Prohibition

MONEY: one per cent

ORDINAL: first, second, second, 1st, first, second, 1st, second

GPE: India, Bombay, Budhan Choudhury, Venkataraman v. Union of India, Bombay

PRODUCT: Article

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //