The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by the Superintending Engineer and ors. Vs. V. Raghunadha Rao - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Nov-25-1992

Court: Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Constitution, Article 14, Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 21 of the Constitution', Article 21 of the Constitution, Article 21, Article 141 of the Constitution of India.12, the Constitution Bench, Article 141 of the Constitution and, the Indian Contract Act, Article 14, Article 141 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 141, Article 375 of the Constitution of India, Constitution, Article 141, Constitution, the Rule of Law, Article 141 of the Constitution, Article 141 of the Constitution of India, Article 141

PERSON: M.N. Rao, K. Ramaswamy, V. Raghunadha Rao v. State of, Ogee Spillway, Khammam District', Sriramsagar Project, Tenderer, Sri Raghuram, Sri Raghuram, Articles 14, Ray, V. Raghunadha Rao v. State, Articles 14, judgments.16, Coleridge, Manchester v. Guardians, V. Padmanabha v. Dy, Tahsildar, Jagannath Baksh Singh v. State, Sarkar, Megarry, Dick, Obiter Dicta, Judicial Dicta, Cottenhan, Selborne, Chinnappa Reddy, J., B.K. Srinivasan, Esher, Devi Bogra v. land, Krishna Singh, Mathura Ahir, Kranthi Sangram Parishath, Sri N. janardhan Reddy, Bench

NORP: J.1, Mandamus, American, ruled:'These, words:'These, C., English, R., British, Guardians

CARDINAL: 9797/83, 461, 29, 2-11-1977, 3-11-1977, as many as 70, 28/77-78, 80,20,884-05, 19, 18, two, 29,36,37, 40, 4, 18, 30-10-1982, eight, 6, 6, One, 2, 28, 6, 1067, 5-11-1976, 73, 28, 24054/87, three, 3, 29,36,37, 1989]2SCR751, 1991)ILLJ395SC, two, four to one, 16(1, four, four, 1, 461, 62(b, 73, 21, 23, 27, 192)The, 244, 249, three, More than one hundred years ago, one, 24, 678, 682):If, 49, 2, 424, 431, three, 251, 34,40, 1, 84, 18, one, 24, 119, four, one, 2, 325, 332, 1992(3)ALT99, one, 1992)4, 139, 1, 1

ORG: Preliminary Specifications, the Andhra Pradesh Detailed Standard Specifications, the State of Andhra Pradesh.2, Rupees Fifteen Lakhs, Rupees Two Lakhs, Chain 91.45, the Government of Andhra Pradesh, Preliminary Specifications, State, Preliminary Specification, PS, the Executive Engineer, the Executive Engineer's, the Executive Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, the Executive Engineer, the Executive Engineer, the Executive Engineer, the Executive Engineer, the Executive Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, Government, Finance and Planning Department, the Reserve Bank of India, the Superintending Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, Arbitrators, TR & B., Superintending Engineer, Clauses 11,29,59,62(b, the Preliminary Specifications, Arbitrators, Arbitrators, State, State, State, State, State, the Superintending Engineer, Contractor's Certificate', Arbitrators, the Superintending Engineer, State Government, State, State, Government, State, State, State, the Superintending Engineer, the Executive Engineer, the Executive Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, State, Court, the Executive Engineer, the Superintending Engineer, the Executive Engineer and, Superintending Engineer, P.Ss.20,22,27(c, P.S.73, the Executive Engineer and, State, State, Judicial, Advocate-General, Advocate-General, State, The Preliminary Specifications, Advocate-General, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, Radhakrishna Agarwal, SC, the Supreme Court, Dwarkadas Marfatia & Sons v. Board of Trustees, Kumari Shrilekha Vidyarthi, U.P., the Supreme Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, Delhi Transport Corporation Mazdoor Congress, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Delhi Transport Corporation case?(2, the Delhi Transport Corporation, the Delhi Transport Act, the Supreme Court, K. Ramaswamy, State, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, Andhra Pradesh, A.P. Standard Specification Clauses 11, Advocate-General, the Supreme Court, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, State, State, State, the House of Lords, Lords, Ormskirk Union, the Supreme Court, Sarkar, U.P., Partners, Exparte Pollard, the Supreme Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, M.R., Poor of Atcham Union, the House of Lords, the Delhi Transport Corporation, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, M.N.Rao, A.P., the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Supreme, Court, M.N.Rao, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, a High Court, the High Court, the Supreme Court, State, U.P. v. Synthetics and Chemicals Ltd., the Supreme Court, Delhi Transport Corporation, State

QUANTITY: 8-11-1977

TIME: 8-11-1977

DATE: 23-12-1977, 18 months, 73, 1983, 7-12-1987, 40, 21, 1977, 1950, one month's, 1988, 1890, 1962]46ITR169(SC, 1969, 1969, more than a century ago, 1890, 1984

GPE: Andhra, Counsel, Bihar, Bombay, Sharma, England, Chittur, Ewing, Karnataka, India, India, India

WORK_OF_ART: Roads and Buildings, Government of Andhra Pradesh, the Constitution of India, Queen's

PERCENT: 3%, 95%

EVENT: the Lumpsum Agreement No, Clause 73

ORDINAL: first, first, third, third, second

PRODUCT: Articles 14, Officers, Regulation 9, Para 250, Bench, Bench

LOC: Sawanth

FAC: Delhi Transport