Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sri Tirumala Modern Rice Mill Vs. Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. (Aptransco) and ors.

Decided On : Apr-02-2007

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 135, the Electricity Act, Section 154, the Electricity Act.3, Section 137, the Electricity Act, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act, Section 126, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 153(1, the Electricity Act, Section 135 of the Act, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 154, Section 126, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 154, the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act?2, Section 126(4, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 153, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act, Section 154(5, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126(5, the Electricity Act, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126, Section 126, Section 126, Section 126, Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, the Electricity Act, the Explanation to Section 126, the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, Section 56, Section 56, the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, the Electricity Act, the Section 126 of the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, Section 154, the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 135, Section 135 of the Electricity Act, Section 135, Section 126(2, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 126(2, Section 126(4, the Electricity Act, the Electricity Act, Section 126(3, the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, the Electricity Act, Section 126(4, Section 126(4, the Electricity Act.31

PERSON: Rao, J.1, XV, Sudhakar Reddy, Sudhakar Reddy, B. Laxmi, Sri A. Ajay Kumar, Parts XIV, Parts XIV, consideration8, Legislatures, B. Laxmi's, XV, XV, G.P. Singh, S. Sundaram Filial, V.R. Pattabiraman, enactment;(2, and(4, T. Sudhakar Reddy v. Government of A.P., Sundaram Pillai 's, Vatan Lal v. S.T.O., Kanpur, T. Sudhakar Reddy's, Toguru Sudhakar's

CARDINAL: three, three, 28.9.2006, two, three, 126(4, 4, three, 10, 9.9.2005, 28.9.2006, 5, 4, 1, 2, 5, 5, 4, 2006CriLJ1679, two, 1987]2SCR1, One, 1979]1SCR26, more than one, one, 2001)7SCC358, more than one, 115, 5, two, two, two, 5, 1, 3, 1, 4, 1, 5, 5, 5, 1, 6, 1 1/2, 1 1/2, two, 5, 220, seven, one, 4, two, two, 1985]2SCR643, three, 1973]2SCR502, 10.2

ORG: W.P. No, CT, CT, CT, CT, ERO, Court, FIR, W.P. No, Northern Power Distribution Company Limited, NPDCL, Learned Counsel, Special Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Divisional Engineer, Learned Standing Counsel for NPDCL Sri A. Bhuvan Sunder Reddy, Court, XV, Court, XV, Dinesh, the Electricity Act?Principles, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Court, Court, Reserve Bank, Supreme Court, A.P., the Supreme Court, Court, District Mining Officer, Tata Iron and Steel Company, Court, Legislature, Court, Legislature, Court, Legislature, Legislature, State, Legislature, Assessing, under:154, The Special Court, the Special Court, the Special Court, Court, Assessing, Assessing, Court, Court, Assessing Officer, Court, the General Terms and Conditions of Supply, Distribution Company, Company, Company, XIV, the Special Court, Legislature, Standing Counsel for APNPDCL, XII, Investigation and Enforcement, the Special Court, XIV, Courts, Legislature, State, Titles, Sections, Marginal Notes, Proviso, Suffice, the Legislature...., Congress, Parliament, Maxwell, the Proviso of an Act, Proviso, Proviso, Proviso, p.217, Maxwell, Statutory Interpretation, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Supreme Court, Maxwell, Court, the Supreme Court, Learned Counsel, the Distribution Company, Dinesh, Proviso, Court, Counsel, Special Court, the Special Court, inter alia, Assessing, XIV, XV, the Inspecting/Assessing Officer, Special Court, Special Court

DATE: 2006, 7335, 2003, six months, 2006, three months, six months, six months, three months, six months, 3/6 months, a period of, three months, a period of, six months, twelve months, twelve months, twelve months, three months, six months, more than three months, six months, six months or, three months, the period of three months/six months, seven days, one working day, seven days, 7) days, one day, 1963, 12th edn., seven days

PRODUCT: L.T. Category-Ill, p.189.25, Judgment

ORDINAL: second, second, third, third, second, second, second, Secondly, 2004(1)ALD546, Secondly, first, third, third

MONEY: fifty per cent, 50 per cent

PERCENT: 50%, 50%, 50%, 50%, only 50%

GPE: Toguru, Toguru, Legislatures, supplied)14, Legislatures, Proviso, Proviso, Proviso

WORK_OF_ART: Rule of Law, 'Principles of Statutory Interpretation'

NORP: apposite.12, Indian, Hiralal

TIME: the entire Act

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //