Semantic Analysis by spaCy
M.C. JaIn Vs. Official Liquidator, High Court of A.P.
Decided On : Mar-18-2006
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Order 1 Rule 10 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Rule 9, Order 1 Rule 10 nor Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 454(5, the Companies Act, Section 454(5, the Companies Act, the Code of Criminal Code, the Companies Act, Section 454(5, the Companies Act, Section 454(5, the Companies Act, Order 1 Rue 10 and Section 151 CPC, Rule 9, the Code of Criminal Procedure is Section 319, Section 239, Section 173, Section 240, Section 319 Cr, Section 319 Cr, Section 173, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 161 Cr, Section 319, the Evidence Act, Section 161 Cr, Section 161, Section 162 Cr, Section 319, Section 319, Section 319, Section 319
PERSON: Bilal Nazki, both.(5A, Court, 228 Cr, Narasimha Reddy, P.C., Narasimha Reddy
CARDINAL: 1, 5(a, 1956.2, 611, 5(a, 512, 611, 611, nine, 5(a, 5(a, 454(5, 5(a, one hundred, 5, 5, 5(a, 9, 1, 887, 17, 2, 649, 1993CriLJ1700, 1
PRODUCT: CA No, CA No, CA No, CA No, Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules, Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules
DATE: 1998, 1956, 2001, 1959, 1998, 1998, 1959, 1956, 1956, 1956, two years, every day, 1898, 1956, 1956, 1959, 1959, 1959, Paras 16, 1998, Para 8
ORG: Directors, The Company Court, the Company Court, the Company Court, Criminal Court, Court, Magistrates, the Company Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, commenced.6, Court, Court, LJ, Para-9 the Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Sections 239, a Sessions Court, Court, Court, Court, Magistrate, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, neigh, a Court of Session, the Supreme Court, Magistrate's Court, the Supreme Court, a Court of Sessions, the Supreme Court, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Court, Para-19, the Sessions Court, Court, the Sessions Court, Court, the Company Court
ORDINAL: 10th, first
GPE: R.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Singh v. State of Punjab, Kishun, Singh v. State of Bihar
QUANTITY: 240 Cr