Kethmal Parekh Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and anr.

Decided On : Nov-15-1971

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 221, the Tax Recovery, Section 222, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 73, Rule 1 of the Second Schedule of the Act, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 73, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 73, the Second Schedule of the Act.8, Section 156, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, The Tax Recovery Officer, Section 222, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer's, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer.16, the Tax Recovery Officer's, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 2, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 73 of the Second Schedule, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 73, the Second Schedule, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Full Bench of the Mysore Highcourt, Section 34, Section 34, Section 222, Section 34, The Full Bench of the Mysore High Court, Section 22, Section 34(3, the Full Bench of the Mysore High Court, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 226(3, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 46(2, Section 46(2, Order 21, Rule 50, Section 46(2, Section 226, Section 222.28, Section 222, the Tax Recovery Officer, Section 2(7, Section 2(31, Rule 2, Rule 2, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 73, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 16, the Tax Recovery Officer, Rule 73

ORG: Kethmal Parekh & Co.', Kethmal Parekh & Co.3, Hyderabad, the Tax Recovery Officer, inter alia, the Mysore High Court, Raja Pid Naik, the Hyderabad Agricultural Income-tax Act, the Mysore High Court, the Agricultural Income-tax Officer, B-Ward, the Allahabad High Court, C-Ward, Kapurchand Shrimal v., the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Schedule 2, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Sections 276, Lordship, Lordship, the Allahabad High Court, Varanasi, the Allahabad High Court, the Supreme Court, C-Ward, Schedule 2, Lordship, Crown, Crown, Union of India

DATE: April 16, 1961, 13th November, 1963, two successive years, 1964, the two years, March 8, 1967, 1961, 21st August, 1971, 37,978.10, years 1962-63, 1963-64, October 11, October 4, 1971, fifteen days, fifteen days, 15 days, '23, 1969]72ITR617(SC, 1969]72ITR623(SC, January 19. 1945, year, '25, 71, that:'Too, 1961, August 21, 1971

CARDINAL: 2,265, 13,000, 1,750, 9,000, 1971.5, 8,000, one, 1, four, 2, 1, 1, 2, more than one, one, two, 1968, 69, 1972]84ITR113(All, two, two, 33, 623, 276A, 277, 2.29, 1971]79ITR570(All, 73, 1.33, 1921, 12, 34, 42

PERSON: Kothagudem, Schedule, Schedule 2, Schedule 2, Rule 2, Schedule 2, Dasaratharama Reddy, Taluqdar, Taluqdar, Behari Lal Ram, Charan Kothi v. Income-tax Officer, Kanpur, M. Rama Rao, Meerut, Ramaswamy J., Order XXI, Schedule 2, Rama Rao, Rama Rao, Rama Rao, Shah J., Schedule 2, Schedule 2, Schedule, Ram Das Jaiswal v. Income-tax Officer, Pathak J. of, Meerut, Rama Rao, Rama Rao, Brandy Syndicate v., C.A.).Rowlatt J., Sathyanarayan Khan, Cal, Schedule 2, nisi

ORDINAL: second, second, 73of, first, first, second, second, second, Second, third, first, first, Second, third, first

GPE: Clauses, assessee, decrees.19, Mys, T.C.

EVENT: the Second Schedule of the Act.12

WORK_OF_ART: The Second Schedule

PRODUCT: Rule 2, the Tax Recovery, Rule 2, Rule 16, Rule 73, a Full Bench, Lordship, Rule 16, Schedule 2

NORP: notice.18, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu, Hindu

FAC: Sahu Rajeshwar Nath v. Income-tax Officer, Sahu Rajeshwar Nath v. Income-tax Officer