Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dundoo Balakrishnamurthy and ors. Vs. Municipal Commissioner, Secunderabad and anr.

Decided On : Feb-15-1961

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Article 228 of the Constitution of India, Section 433, Section 438, Article 19(1)(f, Constitution, Article 19(1)(f, Article 19, Article 19(1)(f, Constitution, Article 19(5, Section 44, the Hyderabad Corporations Act, Section 397 Of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, Section 399, Section 399, Section 399, Section 399, Section 679, Section 679

ORG: ORDERSeshachalapati, the Secunderabad Municipal Corporation.2, Municipal Corporation, the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, Corporation, Corporation, the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation ACT, the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1958, the Supreme Court, The Mysore State Transport Authority, the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, State, the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, Public, the Commissioner of the Corporation, Westminster Corporation, AC 426, the House of Lords, Corporation, the Public Health Act, Legislature, Legislature, Son Ltd., Liverpool Corporation, Sections 397, Corporation, Plan, Corporation, Counsel for the Corporation, Premji Lalji, the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, Counsel, Corporation, Counsel for the Corporation, Government, Government, the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, Bishop, AC 214, Government, Government, Venkateswararao, ILR, Government, Petitioners, Corporation

NORP: J.1, North Western, Mandamus, Mandamus

PERSON: Nos, Certiorari, Venkateswara Rao v. State of, Mohd, Bangalore, 2120 L. A., Pleader, Certiorari, Venkateswarlu, Petitioners, Venkateswarlu, Nos, Macnaghten, Francis Janne, Venkateswarlu, Krishna Prabhu, Venkateswarlu, Venkateswarlu, Venkateswarlu, Blackburn, Jullius v. Lord, Venkateswarlu, Andhra

DATE: 1959-60, 13-5-1959, 1956, 1956, 1958, 1905, 1891, 1880, 1956

CARDINAL: three, 13, 3, 3, six, 1950]1SCR869, 480, 458, 1960]2SCR146 .4, 1, 13, 2, 3, 6, 5, one, one, 82, 362, two, 1, 1, 398, two, 1956.9, 3, two, 5, 325, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2

FAC: the Rastrapati Road, Secunderabad

GPE: Chiranjitlal v. Union of India, Counsel, London, Halsbury, L.C., Goldberg, Counsel, commissioner.12, Oxford

QUANTITY: 3 feet, about 6 feet, 3 feet

ORDINAL: second, third, first, second

EVENT: not,11

LOC: Madras

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //