Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mohommed Pasha and ors. Vs. State of Hyderabad

Decided On : Oct-21-1955

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 342, Section 409, Indian Penal Code, Dai 1355 F, Isfandar 1355, Section 77-B, Section 339, Section 5, the Indian Code, Section 197, Section 197, Section 5, Section 21(9, the Indian Penal Code, Section 197, Section 21, the Indian Penal Code, Indian Penal Code, Section 21, Section 21(9, Section 21, Section 197, Section 409, Section 197 Cr, Section 409, I.P.C., Section 197(1, Section 21, Section 409, Section 409, Deccan LR 161 Criminal, Section 222, Section 409, I.P.C., Section 342, Section 273 Hyd

NORP: Srinivasachari, J.1, Indian, Indian, Punjab, Ansari

ORDINAL: second, second, 12th, 29th, 10th, first, first, first, second

CARDINAL: three, three, 1, 2, 347, 38, 16, 1, 3, 1, 2, 8, 342, 3, three, 8, 201, 197, 1, 3, 1, 2, 5, 9, 43, 1, 2, 1, 2, 5, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2.4, 9, 12, 36, 10, 152, 2, 1, 2, 26, 612, 1, one, 43, 26, 604, 26, two, 2, 3, 4,000/-, three, 2, 1955CriLJ865, one, 128, 1, 2, two, 1, 2, 39, two, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3.17, one, 30, 1, 1, 1953CriLJ154, 18, 2, 13, 26, 6 and 10, 3 and 10, 6, 67, 3, 1, 2, 3, 1, 2, 3, two, 3, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 6 to 9, 22, 3, 3, 1, 2, 3, One, 1, 2, 30, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 30, 1, 1, 2, three, three

ORG: the Hyderabad Criminal P.C., Local Unit, the Commercial Corporation, Supply Department, 6th Khurdad 1353 F, Corporation, the Local Unit, Tehsildar, the Commerial Corporation, the Heads Department, Court held1, The State Prosecutor, the Federal Court, the Privy Council, the Supreme Court, the Federal Court, AIR V 26, Commercial Corporation Ltd., Corporation, this Unit &, Legislature, Supreme, State, AIR V 22, Society, Government, Government, the State Prosecutor, Government, the Defence of Hyderabad Regulation, the Supply Department, State Prosecutor, the Indian High Courts, the Supreme Court, the Federal Court, Singh v. Emperor, Legislature, the Local Government, Court, FC, the Madras High Court, the Federal Court, Hori Ram Singh, Panchayat Court, the Panchayat Court, Court, the Local Government, Court, AIR V 39, the Supreme Court, the Military Engineering Stores Depot, Poona, the Central Government and Government Stores, Court, the Supreme Court, Treasury, Acquaintance Roll, Harma, Khalasi, Treasury, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Government, Court, Court, Local Units, the District Commercial Officer, Register, Government, the State Prosecutor, D.C.O, the Supreme Court, Criminal P.C., Court, State, Units, Counsel, Counsel, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Lordships, Section 342, Department

GPE: Chartana, D.C.O., Cr, P.C., Chartana, Srikantiah, Bombay, P.C., Singh v. State of Pepsu, Cr, P.C., Singh v. State of Pepsu (H, D.C.O., D.C.O., Ex, Counsel, Cr, P.C., Singh v. State of Punjab

PERSON: Jithur Taluq, Punchanama, Ibrahim, Mia Jan Alias Mohd, Pasha, Singh v. Emperor 1939 FC, Varadachariar, J., Shanker Buwa, Syed Ibrahim, J.an, Beg, Ramaji Ray, Sridhar Mahadev v. Emperor, 21st Dai 1355 F., Vide Subbayya, Ramacharulu, Husain Ali v. The State of Hyderabad, Shripat Rau J., Ramiah v. State, Dehu Road, Depot, J., Pepsu, Venkatrama Iyer, J., Gill, Exs, P. W. 5, P. W. 5, Shanker Buwa, P. W. 5's, P. W. 1, Haribhaw, Ex, P. W. 5, Palvinder Kaur v. State of Punjab, P. Ws, P. Ws, P. W. 1, P. W. 5, P. W. 5, Pucca Adatiya, The S. C.

LOC: Parbhani District, Govt, Units

EVENT: Dai 1355F

DATE: 66, 30, '1, 1939, 1952, 1955CriLJ857, monthly, more than 12 months, one year, one year, 35, 36, 37, 1, more than one year, 14, 16, 65, one before 4 years, 2 years, 30

PRODUCT: the-Indian Code, P.W. 5, Registers, Registers, Nag 168 AIR V 30

WORK_OF_ART: Jarida 1355 Part

QUANTITY: 9-6-1355

FAC: Departmental

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //