Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

H. Tulasamma Vs. State Transport Appellate Tribunal and ors.

Decided On : Mar-07-2003

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 90, Section 2(38, Section 80(3, Section 80, Section 80, Section 2(31, Section 71, Section 80, Section 71, Chapter VI, Section 3 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, Section 100, Section 103, Section 104 of the Act, Section 68 of the Act, Section 57(8, the MotorVehicles Act, Section 80(3, Section 57(8, Chapter IV-A of the Act, Section 57(8, Section 57(8, Section 57(8, Chapter-IV-A of the, the Full Bench, the Motor Vehicles Act, the Full Bench, Section 2(38

PERSON: Rao, J.1, Narasannapeta, Sri T. Venkataramana, Bangalore, R. Raghuram v., P. Jayarama Naidu, K. Pamanna v. The, L. Raghuraman v. State, Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, Srikakulamto Sarvakota, Vivek Dwivedi, Prem Narain, K. Pamanna v. The S.T.A.T., L. Raghuraman v. State, Bangalore, Bench, Bangalore, Bangalore, Egappan, Madras, B.A Jayaram, Egappan, L. Raghuraman v. State, M.N.Rao, P. Jayaram Naidu, S. T. A., Bangalore, Madanapalli, Vivek Dwivedi, Prem Narain

GPE: Srikakulam, Sarvakota, Pathapatnam, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, R.P., Srikakulam, Srikakulam, Tekkali, Srikakulam, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, Srikakulam, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, Sarvakota, Counsel, L. Raghuraman v., L. Raghuraman v., K. Pamanna v., Srikakulam, Sarvakota, L. Raghuraman v., Karnataka, Kolar, Counsel, L. Raghuraman v., Srikakulam, Tekkali, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, Srikakulam, Parlakimidi, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, Srikakulam, Srikakulam, Sarvakota, L. Raghuraman 's

ORG: Parlakimundi, the StateTransport Authority, STA, W.P., Court, the State Transport Appellate Tribunal (STAT, STA, STAT, The A.P. State Road Transport Corporation, APSRTC, Parlakimundi, Parlakimundi, Inter-State, Learned Counsel, Parlakimundi, Court, the Supreme Court, K.S.R.T. Corporation, B.A. Jayaram, K.S.R.T. Corporation V.K.S.T. Authority, A.P., Hyderabad, 2001(5)ALD711 (FB).4, StandingCounsel, APSRTC, theState of Andhra Pradesh, theRTA, Standing Counsel, the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Court, A.P., Hyderabad, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.T. Authority, the Supreme Court, Court, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P., Hyderabad, Court, the Supreme Court, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.T. Authority, the State Transport Authority, the Regional State Transport Authority, the Supreme Court, K.S.R.T. Corporation, B.A. Jayaram, Regional Transport Authority, State Transport Authority, State, Regional Transport Authority, Section 72(1, the Regional Transport Authority, Regional Transport Authority, Transport Authority, State Transport Undertakings, the Central Government, State Government, Municipality or Corporation, Road Transport Service, the State Transport Undertaking, State Transport Undertakings, State Transport Undertaking, the State Government, the State Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, the State Transport Undertaking, the State Transport Authority, the Regional Transport Authority, order,--, the State Transport Authority, Regional Transport Authority, State Transport Authority or Regional Transport Authority, the State Government, the Government or Transport Authorities, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, K.S.R.T. Corporation, the Supreme Courtconsidered, The Supreme Court, Bangalore - Cuddapah, the Supreme Court, Pandiyan Roadways Corporation Ltd., Thiru M.A.Egappan, the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, the Supreme Court, K.S.R.T. Corporation v., K.S.R.T. Corporation, BAJayaram, the Supreme Court, Corporation, A.P., Hyderabad, the Supreme Court, K.S.R.T. Corporation, B.A. Jayaram, Pandiyan Roadways Corporation Ltd., Thiru M.A. Egappan, U.P., Court, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Jayaram, the Supreme Court, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.T. Authority, Counsel, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.T. Authority, Counsel for the petitioner.14, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.T. Authority, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.R.T. Corporation, Karnataka High Court, Transport Authority, the Transport Authority, K.S.R.T. Corporation, Supreme Court, State Transport Undertaking, The Supreme Court, The State Transport Undertaking, the Transport Authority, theSupreme Court, the Supreme Court, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.T. Authority, K.S.R.T. Corporation, K.S.R.T. Authority, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, the State Transport Authority, State of Orissa, State of Andhra Pradesh, the State of Andhra Pradesh, Parlakimundi, Sarvakota, Parlakimundi, Madhya Pradesh High Court, the Motor Vehicles Act

ORDINAL: second, second, second, first, third, third, second, first

WORK_OF_ART: Tallasamudram, Adarsh Travels Bus Service

CARDINAL: 26-3-1996, 13, 15-12-2000, three, 1076/87, 584/78, 1 147/87, three, 1984]2SCR768, one, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, more than one, 2, 3, 1, 2, 8, 9, 3, 7, one, 10, one, two, 21.4, 2, 2, 3, two, 15, 1076/87, 584/78, 1147/87, three, two, two, two, one, two

QUANTITY: 6-2-1999

DATE: 1988, 1999, 1950, 1987, 10.1.1980

NORP: Srikakulam, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, inter-State, Srikakulam, inter-State, inter-State, Srikakulam

PRODUCT: the Full Bench, the Full Bench, Kms, the Full Bench, The Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench, the Full Bench

MONEY: the1988 Act

TIME: 57 of 1939 Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //