Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Warner Hindustan Ltd.

Decided On : Jan-17-1978

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 32, the I.T. Act, Section 32, Section 34, Section 43(3, Section 10(5

PERSON: Obul Reddy, Rama Rao, P. R. Ramachandra Rao, Ramachandra Rao, Rama Rao, Jayasingrao Piraji Rao Ghatge v., Kantawala C. J., Jayasingrao

CARDINAL: two, 2, 2, 1,26,254, 1971]82ITR44(SC, two, 4, 1971]82ITR44(SC, one, 1962]46ITR1160(Bom, 101, 270, 273):'The, 1974]96ITR672(Guj, 1962]46ITR1160(Bom, 1974]96ITR672(Guj, 1971]82ITR44(SC, two, 250

ORG: the Tribunal at the instance of the revenue:'1, ITO, AAC, Warner Hindustan Ltd., Hyderabad, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, CIT, Taj Mahal Hotel, Tribunal, ITO, AAC, Tribunal, the Calcutta High Court, Kooka Sidhwa, Co., CIT, the Tribunal on the, Corporation, The Supreme Court, Taj Mahal Hotel's, The Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, CIT, CIT v. Union Bank of India Ltd., the Gujarat High Court, Elecon Engineering Co. Ltd., the Bombay High Court, The Gujarat High Court, Elecon Engineering Company's, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, Taj Mahal Hotel's, AAC, ITO

DATE: years, 1968-69, 1969-70, April 6, 1973, 1976

ORDINAL: first, first, Secondly, second

NORP: allowed--

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //