Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Sohoun Constructions

Decided On : Dec-22-1988

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act, Section 20 of the Act, Section 20 of the Act, Article 299 of the Constitution or otherwise, Article 299 of the Constitution, Article 299 of the Constitution, Section 40, Section 40, Section 40, Article 299(1, Constitution

CARDINAL: 1, 31-3-1973, 17, 31-3-1973, 2., 31-3-1973, 3, two, 1, 25-4-75, 2, 169/75, 16-6-77, 1988]3SCR402, four, 11.75, 4., 17-5-1976, 31-3-1975, two, 17, 13-'Sometimes, one, 250, 121-'A, 192-'In, 5, 6.

GPE: Kottavelasa, A.S.NO, England

DATE: 112/80, 15-5-1976, three months, March 31, 1975, Mar 31, 1975, 1925, Mar. 1975

FAC: Principal Subordinate

NORP: Onthese

ORG: Court, B.3, Sri Venkatrama Reddi, Court, the Supreme Court, Union of India, L.K. Ahuja & Co., the Northern Railways representing Union of India, the High Court of Allahabad, The Supreme Court, AIR, the Supreme Court, Court, PropertyAct, the Railways representing Union of India

PERSON: Exs, Railways, Sri Sitarama Murthy, Ex, Railways, Ex, Sri P. Venkatrami Reddi, Ex

QUANTITY: 9/72 dt

ORDINAL: secondly, first, third, third

WORK_OF_ART: Chitty on Contracts, Cheshire and Fifoot's 'Law ofContract' (10th Edition, 'Chitty on Contracts'

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //