Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Suryalakshmi Cotton Mills Ltd. and anr. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Hyderabad Division and ors.

Decided On : Sep-12-1968

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 21, Constitution, Section 21, Section 20 of the Act, Section 21(6, Constitution, Section 20(1, Section 20(1, Section 14(4-C, Section 21(6, Section 14, Section 19, Section 19(2-A, Section 19(2-B, Section 19(2-C, Section 19(2-B, Section 19(2-A, Section 14, Section 14(4-C, Section 14, Section 20(1, Section 20, Section 19, Section 14, Section 20, Section 20, Section 23.7, Section 19, Section 14, Section 20, Section 20(2, Section 21, Section 21, Section 14 or Section 20(2, Section 14(4, Section 14, Section 20(1, Section 20(2, Section 21, Section 19(2-A, Section 19(2-B, Section 19(2-B, Section 21(6, Article 14 or Article 19(1)(f, Section 20(2, Section 19, Section 14, Section 20, Section 19, Section 19, Section 20, Section 23(1, Section 20, Section 14(4-C, Section 20(2, Section 19, Rule 33, Section 21, Section 19, Section 20(2, Section 20(2, Section 14(4-C, Section 21, Section 20(2, Section 14, Section 21, Section 5(1, the Travancore Act 14 of 1124, Section 47(1, the Travancore Act 23 of 1121, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 5(1, Act 14 of 1124, Section 47(1, Act 23 of 1121, Section 5(1, Section 8(2, Act 14 of 1124, Section 5(1, Act 14 of 1124, Section 47(1, Act 23 of 1121, Section 5(1, Section 47(1, Section 34, Section 6, Section 7, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Section 5, Section 5(1, Section 5(4, Section 5, Section 5(4, Section 5(4, Section 5(1, Section 34, Section 34, Section 5(1, Act 30 of 1947, Section 34, Section 5, Section 34, Section 5(4, Section 5(1).23, Section 5(1, Section 5(1, Act 30 of 1947, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 5(1, Act 30 of 1947, Section 5(1, Act 30, Section 5(1, Section 34, Section 22, Section 5(1, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 34, Act 33 of 1954, Act 33, Section 5(1, Act 30 of 1947, Article 14, Section 5(1, Section 34, Section 5(1, Article 14, Act 30 of 1947, the Travancore Act 23 of 1121, Section 5(1, Article 14 of the Constitution.28, Section 11A(1, Section 11(4)(a, Section 11 A(3, Article 14, Section 11A(1, Section 11(4)(a, Section 11A(3, Section 46, Section 46, Section 30, Section 21, Section 21(6, Article 309 of the Constitution and, Article 311(2, Article 14, Article 14 of Constitution, Article 310, Article 311, Section 5(7A, Section 64, Section 64, Section 64(1, Section 5(7A, Section 5(7A, Article 14, Section 5(7A, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Section 5(7A, Section 5(7A, Section 64, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14, Section 14(4, Section 14(4-C, Section 20(2, Section 20(2, Section 21, Section 20(2, Section 14(4-C, Section 20(2, Section 21(6, Section 14(4-C, Section 20(2, Section 14(4-C, Section 20(2, Section 21, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 20(2, Section 20, Section 21(6, Section 21(6

PERSON: P. Jaganmohan Reddy, Articles 14, Hyderabad III, Articles 14, Sri Venkatappaiah Sastry, suo motu, Articles 14, Sri Ramachandra Reddy, suo motu, Sri Ramachandra Reddy, suo motu, Pleader, T.K. Musaliar, Visvanatha Sastri, Visvanatha Sastri, Lordships, Musaliar, Viscount Simon, Anandji Haridas, Ghanshyamdas, Sri Ramachandra Reddy, Kashiram Bhajan, Lal v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Pleader, Orissa, Shah, J., Pannalal Binjraj v. Union of India, Sri Ramachandra Reddy, Bose

CARDINAL: 6, 330, 8,09,780.22, 12,68,626.96, 11,87,331.00, 23,746.62, 6, 2,67,94,211.79, 8,62,532.65, 21,122.23, 8,41,410.42, two, 4, 4, 2, 2, 1, 1, 2, 6, 6, four, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 1, 2, 3, 23, 23.11, 4, 4, 1, 13, 2, 1, 14, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1, 1, 6, 6, 6, 17, 29, 349, 1954, 26, 1, 1954, 26, 5(1, 5(4, 18, 4, 1, 1, 1954, 26, 20, 550, 4, two, one, 1, 552, 4, 1, 21, 552, 4, 22, 1954, 26, 1954, 26, 1, 8, 33, Two, 1, 2, 17, 24, one, 1, 2, 1, 25, 1954, 26, 1, 1954, 26, one, 29, 1954, 26, 1, 1954, 26, 266, 27, one, 21, 326, 11A(1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 1954, 26, 338, 14, 976, 29, 45, 1, 6, two, two, 785, 32, 31, 2, 29, 725, one, 35, 6, 6, 2, 100

ORG: the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, the Board of Revenue, the Commercial Tax Officer, Hyderabad, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, the Board of Revenue, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, the Board of Revenue, Appellate Tribunal, the Board of Revenue, the Appellate Tribunal, the Board of Revenue under Section 20(1, Board of Revenue, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Sections 14, the Board of Revenue, Sections 14, the Appellate Tribunal under Section 21, Tribunal, Tribunal, The Board of Revenue, the Commercial Tax, Appellate Tribunal, the Board of Revenue suo motu, the High Court, the Sales Tax Rules, the Appellate Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Board of Revenue, the High Court, the Appellate Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Venkatachalam, the Supreme Court, Mohta & Co., the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission, the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission, The Central Government, Commission, the Central Government, Commission, Commission, believe-(a, the Central Government, the Central Government, Central Government, Commission, Commission, Mohta, the Supreme Court, Commission, Mahajan, C.J., the Supreme Court, the Central Legislature, Solicitor-General, the Central Government, Lordships, the Solicitor-General, Mahajan, C.J., Commission, the Supreme Court, the Meenakshi Mills', the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission, Mohta, Mahajan, C.J., Mohta, Meenakshi Mills', the Supreme Court, the Investigation Commission, the Investigation Commission, Mohta, Meenakshi Mills', the Supreme Court, the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission, the Supreme Court, Commission, Commission, S.P. Kushare, the Supreme Court, C.P., Berar Sales Tax Act, Mohta, Hegde, J., Court, State, Section 30(1, Legislature, Sri Venkatappaiah Sastry, State, Bidyabhushan, S.C. 779, the Supreme Court, the State of Orissa, the Disciplinary Proceedings (Administrative Tribunal) Rules, the Civil Services (, Control and Appeal) Rules, the Tribunal Rules, the Tribunal Rules, the Tribunal Rules, U.P. A.I.R., the Tribunal Rules, arise.33, the Central Board of Revenue, the Central Board of Revenue, Bidi Supply Co. v. Union of India, Governments and Legislatures, the Central Board, the Appellate Tribunal, the Board of Revenue, the High Court, the Board of Revenue, Tribunal, Supreme Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Act.39

DATE: 1957, the assessment year 1964-65, 15th June, 1965, 9th June, 1966, 26th November, 1965, 3 years, 9th July, 1968, 10th July, 1968, 10th July, 1968, 21 days, 11th July, 1968, 31st July, 1968, monthly, 30 days, 30 days, 60 days, the same period, 19(1, 19, 20, 21, 19, 20, 21, thirty days, thirty days, sixty days, sixty days, 1956, 713, 1947, 1922, the first day of September, 1948, the first day of September, 1948, 1st January, 1939, September, 1948', 713, 1947, the 17th July, 1954, 1954, before 1st September, 1948, any year, previous year, the 1st day of September, 1939, the 31st day of March, 1946, years, the period of eight years, four years, 713, 1954, 1956, 713, 1947, 1968, 21 of 1947, 1963, 1962, 1922, 1963, 1961, 1245, 1957, 1956

GPE: Mahaboobnagar, Gujarat, Act.3, Visakhapatnam, India, Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam, Clause, A.I.R., Judges

NORP: inter-State, Slates, intra-State, Shree Meenakshi Mills, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Indian, Jagannath Prasad

FAC: 3rd September, 1966

MONEY: 2 per cent

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, second, first, first, first, second, first, first, second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //