Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Prabhudayal Ramanand Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Decided On : Feb-02-1990

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: section 14, the Essential Commodities Act, article 301 of the Constitution of India, Article 301, Article 304, section 5, section 6 and the Third Schedule, section 5, section 5-A, Section 6-B, section 6, section 6, section 14, section 5-A, section 6-B, section 5-A, article 301 of the Constitution of India 14, article 14 or 19(1)(g, article 301 of the Constitution of India, article 301, article 301, article 301, Sales Tax Act, article 301, article 301, article 301, article 301, article 301, article 301, article 303, article 301, article 301, article 307 enables, article 307, article 301, article 301, article 301, article 132 of the constitution of

PERSON: Upendralal Waghray, J.1, Maida, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu 1, Madhya Pradesh, Atiabari, Bachawat, J., Pleader

ORG: State, State, State, State, State, State, the Central Sales Tax Act, State, the Food Corporation of India, the Government of India, Food Corporation of India, the Food Corporation of India, the Food Corporation of India, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, State, State, State, Parliament, the State Legislature, The Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, State, State, the First Schedule, the Central Sales Tax Act, Sales Tax Acts, State, the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax, Government, State, RemarksNo, Maharashtra :, State, Uttar Pradesh, State, Maharashtra State, State, the State Legislature, the Supreme Court, Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd., the Supreme Court, AIR 1988, Indian Cement Ltd., State of Andhra Pradesh, State, the Maharashtra State Government, State, State, Madras v. Nataraja Mudaliar, the Central Sales Tax Act, The Supreme Court, Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd., the State of Assam, State, the Assam Legislature, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, Weston Electronics, State of, AIR 1988, Indian Cement Ltd., State of Andhra Pradesh, SC, AIR 1988, State, State, State, State, Indian Cement Ltd.'s, State, State, State, the Supreme Court, State, Madras v. Nataraja Mudaliar, AIR 1969, SC, the Central Sales Tax Act, The Supreme Court, STC, Parliament, Hegde, J., STC, the State Governments, State, State, the Supreme Court, Parliament, the Maharashtra State, State, State, the supreme Court

CARDINAL: 2, 3, 4, 301, 307, 5, 302, 303, 301, 303, 6., 130, 60, 2, 3, 4)------------------------------------------------------------------------60, 2, 1, 1, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, one half, three, less than fifty, one, fifty, less than one, half, one, some over fifty, 8, 1, 2, 1, 9, 10., One, 130, 16, 60, 1.5, 1, fifty, one, 60, 11, 9, 138, 1, aSchedule II, 12, 13, 1961]1SCR809, 18, 70, 52, 1988)4SCC134a, 1988]2SCR574, 15, 1968]3SCR829, 301, 302, 303, 16, 302, 304, 17, 1961]1SCR809, 56, 52 to 55, 18, three, 70, 52, 1988)4SCC134a, 69, 70, 1988)4SCC134a, 1988]2SCR574, 302, 304, 19, 1968, 22, 376, 147, 9, 386, 399, three, 301, 304, 301, 1961]1SCR809, 5, 6, 22, 250, 23, 24

MONEY: four per cent, four per cent, one per cent, four per cent, ten per cent, four per cent, four per cent, four per cent, 2 per cent, 1 per cent, 1 per cent, 10 per cent

DATE: about 1987, the middle of 1987, 1987, '301, 1957, 16, 15th February, 1989, 14th February, 1989, 6, each year, the year, the year, the year, 1988, 13th September, 1988, 14th February, 1989, 15th February, 1989, 75, 34, 1988, February, 1989, 54, 64, 1988, 1988, 1988, 1988, 42, 21, 1988, February, 1989

GPE: States, India, India, India, States, States, States, States, Orissa, States, States, Weston, Gujarat, States, India, India, Gujarat, States, States, States, States, States, States, India

ORDINAL: first, first, firstly, secondly

QUANTITY: 6-B. Levy

TIME: under this Act

WORK_OF_ART: State of Assam, State of Assam

EVENT: SC 2038, SC 2038, SC 2038

LOC: Western Electroniks'

NORP: inter-State, inter-State

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //