Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Mattapalli Satyam Vs. Kolluru Krishna Murthy and ors.
Decided On : Nov-27-1970
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Section 42, Section 46(2, Section 46(2, Section 42, Section 42, Section 30, Madras) Act II, the Madras Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, Section 42, the Abkari Act, the Revenue Recovery Act, Section 3 of the Land Encroachment Act, the Revenue Recovery Act, Section 42, Section 42, the Revenue Recovery Act
PERSON: Krishna Rao, Venkatesam J., Muthukrishna Ayyar, Ramachandra, Jodaraj Dhupajee
CARDINAL: 1, 194, 60, 1, II, 2., 3, 2, more than one, 230, 5, 244.in, 3, 6, 8
ORDINAL: 11th, 11th, first, 31th
GPE: A.S., O.S., A.I.R.
DATE: 1961, June 23,1952, 1864, 1864, 194/62, '42, 1922, 1922, '46, 1902, 1864, 1864, 1890, 1884, 1905
ORG: Vizianagaram, the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, Government, Kadir Mohideen Marakkayar, Benson, Bashyam Ayyangar JJ, Pitchaikanni, the Madras Revenue, Abkari, Reliance, Somayya, State, the Madras Land Encroachment Act, Government, the Land Revenue Act, Crown, Crown
NORP: Indian, Indian
WORK_OF_ART: 1942 Mad