Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Mattapalli Satyam Vs. Kolluru Krishna Murthy and ors.

Decided On : Nov-27-1970

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 42, Section 46(2, Section 46(2, Section 42, Section 42, Section 30, Madras) Act II, the Madras Abkari Act, the Abkari Act, Section 42, the Abkari Act, the Revenue Recovery Act, Section 3 of the Land Encroachment Act, the Revenue Recovery Act, Section 42, Section 42, the Revenue Recovery Act

PERSON: Krishna Rao, Venkatesam J., Muthukrishna Ayyar, Ramachandra, Jodaraj Dhupajee

CARDINAL: 1, 194, 60, 1, II, 2., 3, 2, more than one, 230, 5, 244.in, 3, 6, 8

ORDINAL: 11th, 11th, first, 31th

GPE: A.S., O.S., A.I.R.

DATE: 1961, June 23,1952, 1864, 1864, 194/62, '42, 1922, 1922, '46, 1902, 1864, 1864, 1890, 1884, 1905

ORG: Vizianagaram, the Madras Revenue Recovery Act, Government, Kadir Mohideen Marakkayar, Benson, Bashyam Ayyangar JJ, Pitchaikanni, the Madras Revenue, Abkari, Reliance, Somayya, State, the Madras Land Encroachment Act, Government, the Land Revenue Act, Crown, Crown

NORP: Indian, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: 1942 Mad

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //