Ch. Atchaiah Vs. Income-tax Officer, 'B' Ward

Decided On : Apr-25-1975

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Land Acquisition Act, Section 41(2, Section 147, the I.T. Act, Section 148(2, Section 148, Section 147, Section 148, the I.T. Act, Section 4, Section 2(31, Section 3, Section 3, Section 25A of the Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 3 of the Act, Section 14(1, Section 3, Section 34, Section 147, Section 41(2

GPE: Kuppuswami, Manmole Village, O.P., derived^, Assessee, Hyderabad City

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: two, one, 75,000, 1,38,794.12, 6/65, 2,08,739Kondal, 1,86,2882, 35,397, 34,000, 69,397, 35,397, 5,71,650, 338/73, 30,000, 69,397, 39,397, 1966]60ITR95(SC, 1959]37ITR107(All, 1974]96ITR612(Delhi, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1966]60ITR95(SC, two, two, one, 1961.9, 1966]60ITR74(SC, one, 80, two, 41(2, 35,397, 338/73, 16

PERSON: Kondal Reddy, Sangareddy Taluk, Medak Dist, Sri Ikramuddin, Azizunnisa Begum, Kondal Reddy, Kondal Reddy, Kondal Reddy, Kondal Reddy, Kondal Reddy, Kondal Reddy, KondalReddy, Kondal Reddy, Kondal Reddy, Kondal Reddy, Ravinder Narain v. ITO, Purna Ginning, Bachu Lal Kapoor, Sri Rama Rao

DATE: October 20, 1962, October 10, 1961, February 4, 1964, December 4, 1964, February 4, 1964, August 3, 1967, 4,17,477, the year 1965-66, the assessment year 1968-69, February 18, 1972, the assessment year 1964-65, April 3, 1962, the assessment year, 1964-65, August 3, 1972, February 4, 1964, September 18, 1972, 1972, February 18, 1972, February 18, 1972, year, 1964-65.6, March 17, 1972, March 10, 1970, January 6, 1970, 1974]95ITR130(AP, 1922, the previous year or the years, 1922, 1922, any year, 79 and, '10, the assessment year 1964-65, the assessment year, 1964-65, March 10, 1970, February 21, 1973, February 18, 1972, February 21, 1973, '13, the assessment year 1964-65, the assessment year 1965-66, the year 1964-65, the year 1964-65, the year 1965-66, December 4, 1964, the year 1964-65, the year 1965-66, March 17, 1972

QUANTITY: 454.11 acres

ORG: ITO, C-Ward, Hyderabad, ITO, ITO, the District Court, ITO, W.P., ITO, ITO, Government, Vide CIT, Joti Prasad Agarwal v., ITO, CIT, Hyderabad Deccan Liquor Syndicate, ITO, HUF, the Supreme Court, CIT, ITO, the Supreme Court, ITO, HUF, ITO, ITO, HUF, HUF, ITO, ITO, ITO, HUF, ITO, HUF, HUF, HUF, Lordships, HUF, HUF, ITO, HUF, ITO, HUF, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, HUF, ITO, ITO, ITO, AAC, ITO, AAC, Government, Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd., sec, sec, ITO, AAC, ITO, AAC, Ramachandrapuram, ITO, ITO, ITO, ITO

PRODUCT: F-Ward, Ramachandrapuram

EVENT: the I.T. Act.4

FAC: Sri Panduranga Rao, Murlidhar Jhawar, Murlidhar Jhawar, Sri Panduranga Rao

ORDINAL: Firstly, Secondly

MONEY: 60 per cent