Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Kommuru Krishnamurthy Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Decided On : Aug-29-1960

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Crown Proceedings Act, the Charter Act, the Charter Act, section 65, Section 65, section 32, Legislatureby this Act, Article 300(1, Constitution, Constitution, Article 361(1, Article 300, Article 300 of the Constitution contemplates

ORG: Kumarayya, the State of Andhra Pradesh, the Highways department, Satyanarayana Talkies, Tenali, Government, Tenali, Canadian Pacific Ry, Government, Crown, Crown, Crown, Petition of Right, Crown, Crown, Crown, Petition of Right, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, telephonic communication, Crown, the Government of India Act, Crown, State, Courts, State, the Government of India Act, Charters, Mayor's Courts, the Privy Council, Privy, Council, Lyons v. East India Co., the East India Company, the Moghul Rulers, Supreme Courts, the Government of India, Crown, the Government of India Act, the Government of India, Crown, the Government of India, Crown, the East India Company, Crown, the Government of India Act, State, State, Council, State, Council, State, Council of India, the Government of India, State, Council, the Secertary of State, State, Council, the East India Company, Crown, State, the East India Company, East India Company, the Government of India, the Government of India Act 1935, the Federation of India, Provincial Government, Provincial Legislature, the Secretaryof State, Council, Government, The Government of India, the Union of India, the Government of a State, State, Parliament, Legislature, State, the Dominion of India, the Government of India, the Government of a State, Government, Parliament, State, Parliament, State, the Government of India, the East India Company, Oriental Steam Navigation Co., State, State, Council, Government, the East India Company, State, ILR, Etti, State, ILR, Maharaja Bose v., GovernorGeneral, Bata Shoe Co. v. Union of India, State, AIR, District Board, AIR, State, the East India Company, Government of India Acts, State, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, Crown, P. W., Tenali, Sattenapalli Sub Division, the Public Works Department, ILR, Government, the Union of India, the Government of Slates, State, Government, Relation, the Parliament orState Legislature

NORP: J.1, English, Indian, English, Indians, English, Diwani, Indian, American

PERSON: Mohiuddin, P. W. 4, P. W. 2, P. W. 3, P. W. 5, Leonard Lockhart, Brougham, Duncan, Common Law, Dicy, Common Law, Charles II, Rani Surnomoyee Dossee, Calcutta Firman, Moghuls, Queen, Actof, Articles 299(2, C. R. App, A. Cockcralt, Bihar v. Rani, Chakravarti, D. W. 1, Tenali Taluk, the P. W. D., Seshagiri Ayyar, J.

DATE: 15-12-1953, five years old, 13 days, about 2 months, that very day, a long year, 1943, 1839, 1947, about the year 1858, 1600, 1726, 1863, 1765, 1836, 1863, the years 1765 and 1774, between 1774 and 1823, 1833, 1858, 1763, 1833, 1858, '66, 1915, 1858, 1858, the year 1861, '10, 1954, the day, 1938, the year 1858

CARDINAL: about 3-45, five, two, 1/2, about 1/2, 6, 910, two, 101, two, 1, twofold, 9, 426, 1, 177, 9, 21, 22, 106, 176(1, 2, 361(1, 9, 69, 843, 51, two, 1, 39, 351, 843, five

ORDINAL: first, 10,000/-by, first, first, second, first, second, first

WORK_OF_ART: Subordinate, Torts (12th edition, Constitution of India, 1915 Mad 993, 1915 Mad 993

GPE: Guntur, India, India, England, England, England, India, India, England, India, England, India, England, India, India, India, India, England, Bengal, England, India, Bengal, Bihar, Orissa, India, India, Bengal, Bombay, England, India, India, India, England, India, England, Peninsular, India, Sonabati Kumari, Bhagalpur v. Province of Bihar, Uday Chand, Province, Bengal, India, England, Governmental, India

PRODUCT: F 894, the Indian Laws, Crown, Crown, Classes

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English, English

LOC: Sovereignly, Madras

MONEY: 5 Bom II

FAC: Chakravarti

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //