Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Anantha Naganna Chetty Vs. the Commissioner of Income-tax, Andhra Pradesh, Hyerabad

Decided On : Sep-12-1969

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 66(2, Section 66(2, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 34, Section 28, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, the Amending Act, Section 28 of the Act, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 5 95-C0, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 176, Section 5(7-C, Section 5, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 28, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 28, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 28, Section 23, Section 5, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(1, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 23(3, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(3, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 28, Section 5(7-C, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(1, Section 5(7-C, Section 28(3, Section 28(3, Section 5(7, Section 5(7-C

PERSON: Gopal Rao Ekbote, J.1, tow provisos, Fray, Statue Law, Annie Besant V. Emperor, R. N. Sons Limited, C. I. T. Mysore Etc, Maxwell, Byles, Sri K. P. Kumar, Sri V. Jha, Sri V. Jha, Sri K. p., Sri V. Jha, Kanila Gatani, A. De, De, De, S. No, Roy, Roy, De, Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta, Ram Naranjan v. Commr

DATE: 1922, 1949-50, the assessment year, 1953, 1953, '10, Mad 1266, months, 1863, 1855, 7 days', '18, 1944, 30th November, 1948, 10th January, 1949, 1963, 3rd March, 1957, 1968

ORG: Siddeswara Oil Company, Appellate, the Appellate Tribunal, The Tribunal, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, him.6, Statutory Construction, Legislature, AIR, M. & S. M. Rly, Asstt, Authority, Legislature, Legislature, Legislature, Cooper v. Wardsworth Board of Works, LJ, the Metroplos Management Act, the District Board, Board, Board, District Board, Bentley, Legislature, See Craies, Legislature, Legislature, Sec, Sec, Calcutta Tanneries, the Calcutta High Court, Bench, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Mulidhar Tejpal, Sec, Lordships, Sec, the High Court, The High Court of Calcutta, Tribunal, Tribunal, sec, Shop Siddegowda & Family, sec, Mysore High Court, Hulekar & Sons v. Commr, the Mysore High Court, the High Court, Court, A. C. Metal Works, the Rajasthan High Court, The High Court, the High Court, Haryana High Court, ITR, Tribunal, the High Court, Haryana High Courts, Patna, Mysore, Rajasthan high Courts, sec, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Department

CARDINAL: 7-11-1962, 17-8-1965.2, 1922.Section, 28(3):---No, 3, 3, 1, 2, 1-4-1952, 56, 115, 91, 121, 217, 1955]2SCR483, 1959]36ITR1(SC, two, 358.17, 32, 185, 111.19, 5(7, 28(3, 5(7, 5(7, 1960]40ITR178(Cal, 3).'and, two, 3, 1961]42ITR129(Patna, 28(3, 134, 135:--'Reading, 135:---'In, 5(7, 48, 262, 1960]40ITR178(Cal, one, one, one, 5(7, 5(7, 1960]40ITR178(Cal, one, one, 1967]63ITR130(KAR, one, 70, 33, two, 5(7, 1960]40ITR178(Cal, one

ORDINAL: first, 6th, first, first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

GPE: France, Bezwada Municipality, it.12, North, J., ', Lahiru, Kumar, stated:--'It, Satprakash

NORP: Indian, Punjab

PRODUCT: Calcutta, Calcutta, Calcutta

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //