Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

N. Pochiah and Co. Vs. Mulle Nagabhushanam

Decided On : Aug-11-1964

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 10(1, Section 4(1)(c)(i, Section 10, Section 10(1, Section 10, Section 10, Section 2(i, Section 10, Section 10(2, Section 11, Rule 40, No 2

GPE: Venkatesam

CARDINAL: two, 28-12-1961, 305/60, 16-12-1960, two, 24, one, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, two, 1 and 3, 1, 1, two, two, two, two, two, 1, two, 40, two, two, 1, one, One, --'Where two, two, 305/60, 8823/1964No

ORG: Workmen's Compensation, Andhra Pradesh Hyderabad, Workmen's Compensation, Court, Commr, Halemabi v. Ardeshir, AIR 1933 Bom 197, the Workmen's Compensation Act, the High Court, the Labour Office, Labour, the Andhra Pradesh Government, N. Pochaiah & Co., the Saw Mill, the Saw Mill, the Saw Mill, the Saw Mill, Workmen's Compensation

PERSON: Nagabhushanam, N. Pochaiah, N. Lakshminarayana, Workman, Nagabhushanam, N. Pochaiah, N. Pochiah, above.4, N. Pochaiah and Co., Sri Shiv Shankar, Nos, N. Lakshminarayana, N. Pochiah, Lakshminarayana, Case Nos, C. M. P. Nos

EVENT: the Workmen's Compensation Act

DATE: 1923, June 1957, 9th June, 1958, two years, 10-7-1961, the four years, two years, two years, two years, 1452, two years, three days, two years, '12, 110/61, 1497/1962

ORDINAL: first, second, first, 1st, first, second, third, third, third

QUANTITY: 56-2/3

NORP: and3, Commr, and3, Rules, parties.15

PRODUCT: rules.16

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //