AzizuddIn Ansari Vs. State of Hyderabad and anr. - Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Decided on: Oct-29-1953

Court: Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Article 226, Constitution of India, Section 5, Article 226 of the Constitution, Constitution, Act 55, Section 1 Influx, Section 4, Section 5 of the Act, Section 4, Rule 31, Section 4, Section 5 of the Act, Section 7 of the Act, Section 5 of the Act, Section 7 of the Act, Section 5, Section 5 of the Act, List 1, Article 7, Constitution, Article 19(1)(d, Section 7 of the Act, Constitution, Article 19(1)(d, Section 5, Section 2, Section 7 of the Act, Section 4, Constitution, Article 7 of the Constitution, Section 5 of the Act, Section 7 of the Act, Section 7 of the Act, Section 7 of the Act, Section 7, Article 19(1)(d) & (e, Article 19(1)(d, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19(1)(d) & (e, Article 21, Article 19(1)(d)(e, Constitution

NORP: Srinivasachari, J.1, British, Mandamus

CARDINAL: one, 200/-, 17, 34, 17, 34, 22, 24, 55, 2, 200/-, 1,000/-, 2, 2, 2, 2, 31, 17, 19, 18, 1950CriLJ1383, 1953CriLJ180, 1950CriLJ1383, 50/-

PERSON: Azizuddin Ansari, Petitioner, Petitioner, Petitioner, Shabbar Hasan, Hanif v. State of M. P. AIR, Atau Raheman, Amin Badshah, Haji Shah v. State, Tendolkar, A.K. Gopalan v. State, Ajaib Singh, Gopalan, Chagla C. J. and, Gajendragadkar, Noor Mohammed Ali Mohammed

ORG: the State of Hyderabad, the Chief City Magistrate of Hyderabad, the Commissioner of Police, Court, the State Government, Court, the Central Government, the State of Hyderabad, Hyderabad, Hyderabad, the State of Hyderabad', the Central Government, Sec 4, Permit System, the City Magistrate, the Permit System Rules, this Sub-Rule, Sub-Rule, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, the Dominion Legislature, the Dominion Legislature, Schedule of the Government of India Act, State, the Central Government, The Central Government, Government, the Allahabad High Court, Judges of the Allahabad High Court, the Uttar Pradesh Government, the Permit System Rules, Evacuee, the Central Government, the High Courts, Vide - Mohd, State of, the Inauguration of the Constitution, the Bombay High Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the - State of Punjab v., the Abducted Persons (Recovery and Restoration) Act, Lordships, the High Court of East Punjab, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court

GPE: India, Pakistan, India, East Pakistan, Influx, Pakistan, India, Pakistan, India, India, Pakistan, Pakistan, India, Influx, Pakistan, India, Pakistan, India, Influx, Pakistan, India, India, West Pakistan, Influx, Pakistan, India, West Pakistan, Influx, Pakistan, Influx, Pakistan, India, Influx, Pakistan, Pakistan, Pakistan, India, Influx, Pakistan, India, Pakistan, Clause, India, West Pakistan, India, East Pakistan', India, East Pakistan, India, India, India, Influx, Pakistan, Paragraph No., India, India, India, India, India, India, Pakistan, Pakistan, Pakistan, Pakistan, India, India, India, India, India, Pakistan, Pakistan, Influx, Pakistan, India, Influx, Pakistan, Lahore, India, Influx, Pakistan, India, India, India, India, Gaya, India, Pakistan, Influx, Pakistan, India, India, Pakistan, Clause, Pakistan, Influx, Pakistan, India, India, Influx, Pakistan, India, India, Pakistan, Pakistan, India, India, Pakistan, India, Bombay, Influx, Pakistan, Kania, C. J., Influx, Pakistan, India, India

DATE: May 1950, June 1950, 1949, 1948, 1948, 1948, 1949, 1950, 1950, 1950, 1949, May 1950, June, 1951, 1949, one year, Para 17, 1949, 1949, 1948, 1948, 7 days, 1949, 1951 Nag 38, 12-12-1950, 1949

WORK_OF_ART: Ordinance, Ordinance

ORDINAL: second, third

LOC: West Pakistan, Madras

QUANTITY: 9-4-1952