Gangadharabhatla Satyanarayana of Yeleswaram Vs. Mudi Narayanswami of Yeleswaram

Decided On : Dec-24-1959

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, the Indian Penal Code, Section 106, Section 369 Cr., Section 369, Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 369, Section 369, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 369, Section 369, Section 435, Section 439(1, Section 11, Order 1 Rule 9, Section 115, the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 11, Section 403, Section 369, Section 106, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 106 of the Act, Section 106, Section 106 of the Act, Section 127, Section 127, Section 106, Section 127, Section 106, Section 127, Section 106 of the Act or Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure or Section 6 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, Section 127, Section 106, Section 197, Section 6, Section 127, Section 127, Section 127, Section 127(1, Section 106 of the Act, Section 127(1, Section 106 of the Act, Section 106 of the Act, Section 106 of the Act

GPE: ORDERSanjeeva, East Godavari District, Gangadharabhatla Satyanarayana, Bihar, Bombay, AIR, C.P.C., Venkataraman

NORP: J.1, Srinivasachari

ORG: the Additional District Munsif Magistrate, the Panchayat Board, Yeleswaram, the Panchayat Board, the Panchayat Board, the High Court, Sections 167, the Additional District Munsif Magistrate, Kakinada, the Inspector-General of Local Administration, Criminal Revision Petition, Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No, Criminal Revision Petition, Court, Court, the Revision Petition, Revision Petition, this Criminal Revision Petition, the High Court, a Criminal Revision Petition, Revision Petition, the High Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, a Criminal Revision Petition, a Criminal Revision Petition, the High Court, the High Court, J., ILR, Cal 121, Ibrahim v. Emperor, AIR, Calcutta, Magistrate, the High Court, the Patna High Court, AIR, Singh v. Emperor, AIR, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Order IX Rule, Section 403 Cr, the High Court, this Criminal Revision Petition, Court, the Panchayat Board, the Panchayat Board, the Government under Section 106 of the Act, the Panchayat Board, the Supreme Court, State, Court, Court, Panchayat, the Panchayat Board, the Panchayat Board, the Supreme Court's, the Panchayat Board, Government, Government, Government, the Inspector-Generalof Local Administration, Inspector-General ofLocal Administration, Court, Legislature, the State Government, Government, the Government under Sees, Government, the Inspector-General of Local Administration, Government, the Inspector-General of Local Administration, Yeleswaram, Ex-Temporary, the Yeleswaram Panchayat, High Courts, the Supreme Court, the Inspector-General of Local Administration

PERSON: Kakinada, M. Narayanaswami, Krishnarao, K. Ramachandrarao, Ramachandrarao, Ranga Rao v. Emperor, N. Appayya v. D. Venkatappayya, Tadi Somu Naidu, Raj Mallaiah, N. Narasayya, Wallace, suo motu, suo motu, K. Srinivasamurthy, Srinivasamurthy, Sridiiar Rajwar, Uauiautar Thakur v. State of, Pat 33, Sulaiman J. in, Hori Ram, Lordships, Order XLVII C.P.C., Krishna Rao, J., K. Ramachandrarao, K. Ramachandrarao, Srinivasamurthy, Srinivasamurty, Sri M. Narasimhaswami, Sri G. Satyanarayana, Sri Narasimhaswami

CARDINAL: 297, 2., 3., 468, 468, 32, 320, 13-3-1959, 23, 456, 640, 227, 23, 44, 23, 23, 40, 456, 640, 227, 5., 21, 1955CriLJ1410, 43, 1955CriLJ1410, one, 13, 6, 1958CriLJ254, 8, 1, 9, 10, 1, 28, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

DATE: 1956, 11-7-1956, 1957, 1959, 1959, 44, 46, 1959, 1959, 1928, 42, 48, 49

PRODUCT: Nookamma, Rang 288, Rang 288

WORK_OF_ART: a Writ Petition

FAC: Damu Senapati, Presidentship

EVENT: Rane 288, the Penal Code

ORDINAL: second, first, second, first, second, second, firstly, secondly