Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Prince Muffakkam Jah Bahadur

Decided On : Jan-31-1989

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: Section 3 of the Wealth-tax Act, section 2, section 6, the Estate Duty Act, the Expenditure-tax Act, section 27, section 7, section 7, section 7(1, section 2, section 2(e

PERSON: Jeevan Reddy, J.1, Subject, Gift, Appendix, Anwar Begum's, Shahebzadi Anwar Begum, Anwar Begum, Anwar Begum, Shahebzadi, Shahebzadi, Shahebzadi, Purshottam N. Amersey

DATE: 1957, each of the years 1969-70 to, 1957, years, every year, the April 1, 1970, year - (, six years, 1953, 34 of 1953, 1957, 29 of 1957, 1958, 18 of 1958, more than twelve months, annual, minus 1, annual, annual, those years, three years, the three years ending, annual, 1969, November 5, 1971

ORG: the Appellate Tribunal, H.E.H., Nizam, Nizam, H.E.H., Nizam, Prince Mukaram Jah, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Bench, Nizam, Prince Muazzam Jah Bahadur, the Bombay High Court, CWT, Bench

CARDINAL: 1B, 2, One, 3., 4, 5, 1, 2, 6, 7, 1B, 1B, 1, 1, 1, 1+i, 8, 2, 1, 9, 1B, 10, 11, 1B, 1B, 1B, 69, II, 12, 1969]71ITR180(Bom, 13

GPE: Chamilijah, assessee, R.C., Shahebzadi

NORP: Hindu, p+d

MONEY: five per cent, 6 1/2 per cent

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //