Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Prince Muffakkam Jah Bahadur
Decided On : Jan-31-1989
Court : Andhra Pradesh
LAW: Section 3 of the Wealth-tax Act, section 2, section 6, the Estate Duty Act, the Expenditure-tax Act, section 27, section 7, section 7, section 7(1, section 2, section 2(e
PERSON: Jeevan Reddy, J.1, Subject, Gift, Appendix, Anwar Begum's, Shahebzadi Anwar Begum, Anwar Begum, Anwar Begum, Shahebzadi, Shahebzadi, Shahebzadi, Purshottam N. Amersey
DATE: 1957, each of the years 1969-70 to, 1957, years, every year, the April 1, 1970, year - (, six years, 1953, 34 of 1953, 1957, 29 of 1957, 1958, 18 of 1958, more than twelve months, annual, minus 1, annual, annual, those years, three years, the three years ending, annual, 1969, November 5, 1971
ORG: the Appellate Tribunal, H.E.H., Nizam, Nizam, H.E.H., Nizam, Prince Mukaram Jah, Tribunal, Appellate, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Bench, Nizam, Prince Muazzam Jah Bahadur, the Bombay High Court, CWT, Bench
CARDINAL: 1B, 2, One, 3., 4, 5, 1, 2, 6, 7, 1B, 1B, 1, 1, 1, 1+i, 8, 2, 1, 9, 1B, 10, 11, 1B, 1B, 1B, 69, II, 12, 1969]71ITR180(Bom, 13
GPE: Chamilijah, assessee, R.C., Shahebzadi
NORP: Hindu, p+d
MONEY: five per cent, 6 1/2 per cent
LANGUAGE: English