Government of Andhra Vs. N. Nagendrappa and ors.

Decided On : Mar-20-1956

Court : Andhra Pradesh

LAW: section 3(3, Article 286(1)(b, section 2, Section 2(i, Section 3, section 5, Section 5, Section 19, section 3(3, section 5(vi, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, a Full Bench, Article 286(1)(b, Constitution, a Full Bench, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b, Article 286(1)(b)Cochin v., Article 286(1)(b, Constitution, Article 286(1)(b, a Constitution Bench, Article 286(1)(b

PERSON: ORDERViswanatha Sastry, N. Rajeswara Rao, Madras, Paidanna, S.T.C., STATEMENT.(a, Madras, S.T.C., Madras, S.T.C., S.T.C., Shanmugha Vilas Cashew-Nut Factory, Madras, Shanmugha Vilas Cahsew-Nut Factory, Madras, Shanmugha Vilas Cashew-Nut Factory

NORP: J.1, Rules, Rules, Rules

ORG: the Turnover and Assessment Rules, State, State, the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, State, Tribunal, State, the Provincial Legislature, the Government of India Act, the Supreme Court, Syed Mohammad & Co., State of Andhra, the Government of India Act, the State Government, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, ToThe Assessing Authority, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, Court, Govindarajulu Naidu & Co., State, State, Madras v. Chambers Ltd., the Andhra High Court, State, Court, the Supreme Court, State, Judges of, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, State of Travancore-Cochin v. The Bombay Co., Ltd., State, the Supreme Court, Sate, State, State, Das, State of Travancore-Cochin v., Court, Court, Govindarajulu Naidu & Co., State, State, the Supreme Court, State, Gurviah Naidu & Co., Ltd., Das, Officiating, C.J., the Supreme Court, State, Court, Travancore-Cochin v., The Bombay Co., Ltd., State, Court, Travancore-Cochin v., the Supreme Court, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, State, Tax Revision Cases Nos, Tax Revision Cases Nos

GPE: India, Province, skins.6, Madras v. Rallis, Madras v. Rallis, India, India, India, India, India, London

CARDINAL: Two, 1, 2, 90, 1, 104, 48, 108, 111, 48, one, one, 4, 4(2, 2, 16, 16, 1, 3, 16(2)(ii, 16(2, one, 16(2)(ii, 16(2, 199, 405, 6, 157, 16(2, 199, 16(2)(ii, 434, 205, 405, 205, 6, 717, 434, 205, 15(5, 44, 26, 45, 50

DATE: 1942, 1935, 1954 5, 1935, each year, such year, 16, '4, '16, the month of .....................................................Name(s, 4)'7, 1954 5, 1952 3, 1955, 1954 5, 1st July, 1954, '10, 1952 3, '11, 1953 4, 1952 3, 1953 4, 1955, 1952 3, 1953 4, '12, each month, the preceding month, the preceding month, that month, month, 25, 41, 1956

ORDINAL: first, first

EVENT: List II, List II

PRODUCT: the Full Bench